Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
A F2P with 174 players is a dying game
hes been unironically doing this for a long time
I paid for the right to be critical of this game from day 1. Unlike you I'm not going to other fps game forums being a homer for WW3 while trying to recruit people to play this game... Looking at you.
Not really. There's really only 3 competitors. Delta Force is doing great right now because it is still new. I can't see it staying in the spotlight it is in now forever though, even if it does rival Battlefield 2042. CoD is doing good of course, but they have lost quite a alot of players and are still losing them. Battlefield 2042 had a terrible launch and is finally alive but it's clinging on to it as it is also still losing players.
WW3 has a great chance to pop off as another competitor if the updates are quick enough and there is marketing for it. Though, I wonder if a rebrand could help so everyone can forget about WW3s past. I mean, just look at some of the people now who are already writing it off due to its launch despite it having new developers. The bones are already there.