Have WW3 anything like RUSH MODE in Battlefield 3/4??

[DARKO]

Have this game anything like rush mode?

Do you plan optimize game for slower CPUs like 6300hq... ?

Also any plans for renting servers?

[DARKO]

Originally posted by ACPL Jon:

Explain "rush mode". From what I remember, it's more like "Conquer". Attack and seize or defend the points. And TDM, with infantry-only combat.

Map is mostly split to one long corridor.

Every team have number of tickets(lives) (eg 300) and your objective is take two MCOMs (you place bomb at that place), defenders try to defend that places and when is armed they have some time to disarm bombs. When you succesfully destroy MCOMs you unlock next area...

Try sometimes BF3 Metro map RushMode (first 2 MCOMs phase is unbalanced BUT in middle -second/thrird phase (inside METRO) they are very fun to play) .

It is less about K/D ratio but more about team spirit and teamplay.

Third phase is lot about explosives (any many noobs will cry here) but is always doable and is very AMAZING BREATHTAKING moment when you BREAK thru!

Best rush maps are METRO /Noshar Canals/ Damavan Peak/Bazar / Kharg Island/ and some premium maps.

[大无法2]

It's a bad model.
Because this model is very difficult to balance.

[DARKO]

Originally posted by ACPL Jon:

Uhhh, Op. Metro is an awful corridor blastpit. Okay, I now know what You mean. Well here battlefield is more open and like I said more similiar to Conquest. The fight is more nonlinear than in Rush, there's no "tickets" to bleed (instead there's a fixed point cap teams strive for, holding 2 cap points of the same "kind" like C1 & C2 grants you points). It works well and have enough both "wiggle space" \ flanking and "head-on" engagements on both [mainly] short ranges and [less often] longer ranges. It works really well and feels like classic Battlefield titles.

So basicaly this is just HALF BATTLEFILED 3 (that already have conquest mode too)

- have less players then game from 2012 , i can find even during night populated servers for RUSH /CONQUEST/ TEAM DEATHMACTH in bf3/4
- have smaller player count in game session 30 MAX vs 64 in BF3 - this is HUGE difference in game experience...
- have terrible performance, BF3 CAN run even on DUAL CORE CPU medium settings!!
- don't have rented servers?

After BF5 fkup i WAS hoping for some concurrency to BATTLEFIELD, but it seems there is none :/

and BTW you can buy bf 3/4/1 for 15 bucks combined when on sale...
bf3 was even for free some time ago...

[Практик волюнтаризма]

Originally posted by DARKO:

[
and BTW you can buy bf 3/4/1 for 15 bucks combined when on sale...
bf3 was even for free some time ago...

It's not like anyone is forcing u to play or even buy WW3. It's actually opposite: devs were practically forced to do this FreeWeekend with constant whine and demanding.

[Borreh]

Our community is hosting Breakthrough events every now and then and testing out how a Rush mode would work, check out our Facebook groups, you shouldn't miss them.

Given the amount of interest it's getting an official Rush mode is probable :)

[DARKO]

Originally posted by F51 Borreh:

Our community is hosting Breakthrough events every now and then and testing out how a Rush mode would work, check out our Facebook groups, you shouldn't miss them.

Given the amount of interest it's getting an official Rush mode is probable :)

After hearing that RUSH mode is probably COMMING i added this game to my WISHLIST !!

, only thing that matter to me is 64 players full map to actually enjy it ;)

What Battlefield distinguish (in Positive way) from rest FPS "EGO CENTRIC" shooters is ability to reward teamplay. For example you can have K/D 5/100 and still be in Top 10, you are rewarded with score and be valuable for team by Reviveing teammates, or provide vision (good placed TUG, MAV) , providing AMMO, taking risk and taking MCOMs , placing beacon on good spot ...

And RUSH mode is great example of it.

Btw i dont like FB, but will watch you on reddit.

[DARKO]

Originally posted by F51 Borreh:

Our community is hosting Breakthrough events every now and then and testing out how a Rush mode would work, check out our Facebook groups, you shouldn't miss them.

Given the amount of interest it's getting an official Rush mode is probable :)

BTW you dont answered all my question, like if you plan rented servers, and if you plan better CPU optimization?

[Borreh]

Rented servers aren't planned ATM but if the community will want them they'll get them. The game is constantly being optimized to expect it to run smoother for most players within a few months time.

[DARKO]

Originally posted by F51 Borreh:

Rented servers aren't planned ATM but if the community will want them they'll get them. The game is constantly being optimized to expect it to run smoother for most players within a few months time.

Thank you very much for quick answers man, respect that

[Jacksepa]

Im hoping for rush mode

[JCglitchmaster TTV]

I could get down with a rush mode (if you design the maps and player numbers well around this mode). Davamand peak and operation metro on 24-32 player servers in rush mode on BF3 was some of the best times I have ever had in an online game.

[DARKO]

Originally posted by JCglitchmaster:

I could get down with a rush mode (if you design the maps and player numbers well around this mode). Davamand peak and operation metro on 24-32 player servers in rush mode on BF3 was some of the best times I have ever had in an online game.

i love how battlefield gameplay change almost every rush phase, Like second phase in metro is about LMG, third phase about explosives grenades/m320 LVG smoke.

and Damavan Peak jump from mountain is best moment of bf 3 :D