VTOL VR POO

[Bong]

Delete all my posts about asking for new vehicles, idk. Its ur game that ur letting go anyway. The amount of people that want new vehicles and you simply say,, what can that plane do that this one can't? 99%. People are not asking for anything but new planes which you will not add, why. Because mr f16 can do what mr f15 can do? THATS WHY THERES MANY VEHICLES IN AVIATION, EACH ARE DIFFERENT NOT MERGED INTO ONE PLANE MAKING IT BORING.

Im sick of asking for new planes, will i stop? Probably not, Because more than half the game wants them. What can go wrong for adding new vehicles? ur not gonna lose players for adding new vehicles, just laziness. I understand its a single dev, But my friend, Theres many games out there with one dev.

[Wong_Wei]

LOL

[Rockethead293]

ok. who asked?

[Aeroneer]

based

[Mysterious Drone]

I farted.

[醉仙望月]

Originally posted by Bong:

Because mr f16 can do what mr f15 can do? THATS WHY THERES MANY VEHICLES IN AVIATION, EACH ARE DIFFERENT NOT MERGED INTO ONE PLANE MAKING IT BORING.

Why do we need the F-16 when we have the F-15? While the F-16 isn't as powerful, it's smaller, making it more economical and easier to maintain.
But VTOL VR is a computer game, and respawning does not cost anything. There's no point giving up features to cut costs.
So as the dev says, add vehicles by adding new gameplay, not by cutting features.

[Bong]

Originally posted by 醉仙望月:

Originally posted by Bong:

Because mr f16 can do what mr f15 can do? THATS WHY THERES MANY VEHICLES IN AVIATION, EACH ARE DIFFERENT NOT MERGED INTO ONE PLANE MAKING IT BORING.

Why do we need the F-16 when we have the F-15? While the F-16 isn't as powerful, it's smaller, making it more economical and easier to maintain.
But VTOL VR is a computer game, and respawning does not cost anything. There's no point giving up features to cut costs.
So as the dev says, add vehicles by adding new gameplay, not by cutting features.

I was just using it as an example, i shouldn't of put the f16. It just popped in my mind as i was writing it, But i dont think it matters what vehicle he adds. As long as he adds them.

[醉仙望月]

No one is against adding new vehicles.
Since the dev has already said that each new vehicle must have a new gameplay mechanic, when requesting a new vehicle just come up with a new feature for him to add.
If you object to his rule that the new vehicle must do something that the existing vehicles can't, it has been hashed out and he is sticking with his decision. There is nothing you can do about it.
If you would like to chat with the dev, or others interested in VTOL VR, join the BDynamics Discord server here: https://discord.gg/azNkZHj

[Broseph884]

I swear to god live service games have fried people's brains. The game is complete, the dev has NO OBLIGATION to add more vehicles, but when they do it's a nice surprise. Please learn to deal with it.

[[713th] AlphaTBW]

Originally posted by 醉仙望月:

No one is against adding new vehicles.
Since the dev has already said that each new vehicle must have a new gameplay mechanic, when requesting a new vehicle just come up with a new feature for him to add.
If you object to his rule that the new vehicle must do something that the existing vehicles can't, it has been hashed out and he is sticking with his decision. There is nothing you can do about it.
If you would like to chat with the dev, or others interested in VTOL VR, join the BDynamics Discord server here: https://discord.gg/azNkZHj

EASY:
Rotor-wingaircraft with the distinctive coaxial rotor system of the Kamov design bureau.
Having a coaxial rotor with blades of polymer results in low inertia both relative to vertical and lateral axes, at 50%–75% as compared to a single rotor helicopter with tail rotor. No tail rotor also means it can perform flat turns at all speeds. A maximum vertical load of 3.5 g combined with low inertia makes the Ka-50 highly agile.

Single-seated (Ka-50) Two-Seated (Ka-52)

[Mors]

Originally posted by 713th AlphaTBW:

Single-seated (Ka-50) Two-Seated (Ka-52)

Not the known KA-50 or KA-52, but make the KA-50 modernized

http://www.aviastar.org/cockpits/ka-50mod.jpg

That should be easy to do.
And apply the radar to the rotor like Mi-28 has:

https://www.twz.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/17/12-Mi-28NM-declared-ready-to-delivery-in-Rostvertol-20-January-2022cZvezda-TV.jpg?w=2048&h=1152

And then put a targeting pod like in modern KA-50's have...
https://aviadejavu.ru/Images6/AN/AN01-7/58-2.jpg

The Shkval is in place in nose as that is additional mod to have Shkval-M under it.

[醉仙望月]

Originally posted by 713th AlphaTBW:

Rotor-wing aircraft with the distinctive coaxial rotor system of the Kamov design bureau.
Having a coaxial rotor with blades of polymer results in low inertia both relative to vertical and lateral axes, at 50%–75% as compared to a single rotor helicopter with tail rotor. No tail rotor also means it can perform flat turns at all speeds. A maximum vertical load of 3.5 g combined with low inertia makes the Ka-50 highly agile.
Single-seated (Ka-50) Two-Seated (Ka-52)

We already have the AH-94 attack helicopter.
The dev said:

Originally posted by Paolo:

I'm not saying I have any solid plans or anything, but if there were to be another chopper it would be along the lines of a Blackhawk.
A Blackhawk type could have all kinds of different equipment.

Then we can have new features such as door gunners, infantry rappelling, anti-submarine, etc. that attack helicopters do not have.

[YEETABIX]

I'm gonna level here I too wish there were more vehicles, i like the changes hes making i really do but i think opfor aircraft should be added, especially since multiplayer is vanilla now, it would add variety in the game, other alternatives could be a ground attack fixed wing, or some kind of logistics/transport system and dedicated vehicle (not the AV-42 thats a mixed roll vtol think how the MI-24 also could carry troops). long story short I too want more vehicles and I'm tired of pretending like I don't

[YEETABIX]

logistics system and cargo/transport vehicles would also allow for an insane multiplayer experience

[Duelist9]

Adding a new aircraft takes a ton of development time. It needs modelling, cockpit modelling, flight modelling, avionics modelling, balancing, etc. Baha (the dev) doesn't want to add an aircraft if it doesn't add anything new to the game experience. Adding say, another air superiority 4thgen like the F/A-26B would be redundant. Baha is currently adding features like weather, improving current planes, balancing, improving the mission editor, etc.

Also, no real life aircraft will ever show up in game. At most, there will be very heavily inspired aircraft. Licensing is a pain, costs a huuuuge amount of money, and isn't worth it. The A-10 will never get added, the F-16 will never get added, and the F-15 will never get added.

However, I will introduce you to a great thing! MODDING! The mod loader is ON STEAM for FREE. There's already a very good F-16 mod that's super high quality. There's also an A-10 being developed by the same person.

[Duelist9]

Oh, also here's a list of what current planes can be used to LARP as:
AV-42C: Harrier, V-22, A-10, UH-60
F/A-26B: F-15, F/A-18, F-22, Su-27/30/33/35/37, Su-57
F-45: F-35, F-22, Su-57, Harrier, Convair Model 200, Yak-38, Yak-141, KF-21
T-55: F-16, F-5, T-38, Yak-130, KAI T/FA-50, Legacy F/A-18
EF-24G: F-14, EA-18G, F-111, Panavia Tornado, Mig-23, Mig-27
AH-94: AH-1, AH-1Z, AH-64, AH-56, RAH-66, YUH-61, AH-6, RAH-66, Bell Invictus