Still want an A-10 in VTOL

[Jawsman01]

Yeah, I know that this has been posted before. That MANY of us would STILL LOVE to fly an A-10 style aircraft here in VTOL. Been posted MANY times. I have read all of them too. They are such smart people. And cool people as well.
That means something by the way now doesn't it?

Think about it for at least a second or more... Lots of people have said they want to fly an A-10 in here. Hmmmn $$$. I have not read anyone wanting a trainer or electronic warfare style as much as I have read about those wanting an A-10. There sure is something desirous about that A-10. I bought the newest trainer and the chopper, but I sure would prefer an A-10.

Yes, been posted before and loved on and hated on. Those views that disagreed and argued against adding an A-10 meant nothing to me at all whatsoever. What folly to NOT want another world's best ground attack aircraft? That's an A-10 alright.
Yeah, A-10's are a pretty sweet ride. Smart people sure do love them.

When you have a fav fighter you just want to fly it. Period. And I want the A-10 in VTOL. Yup.
Not something kind of like it either like the dropship. No, much more like the A-10 mod.
The dropship is cool, but it just is not an A-10. But, I do fly it quite often.

Please do not hijack this thread with how another jet is already kind of like it etc, or rehash how the dev is doing what he wants introducing new content that he favors over what is repeatedly requested here and elsewhere.
We all have seena nd read that over and over. We got that point.

Been there, read that. Still do not care, I would really LOVE to fly the A-10 in this title. Dissenters have already bored me with weak arguments against having an A-10.
So unimpressive to NOT want one added. Life is too short to waste on such.

I did download the A-10 MOD once off the vtol mod loader site. It worked for about a day after I spent hours trying to get the site to download it correctly. Man, that site it a trainwtreck.
I have not been able to get it to update or download anything successfully all year from there since... A real shame too, as it sure brought NEW life to this sim for me. I reinstalled vtol just because of that A-10 mod and the mod loader site.

Regardless, if you hijack this thread trying to force everyone to hear your take on why an A-10 should not ever be added then you just do not want to play nice and respect what MANY of us have expressed already. Many times.

You could start your own thread called,
'Why people posting how much they would LOVE to fly an A-10 in VTOL are wrong'.
But then, that would be pretty disrespectful now wouldn't it?

Almost as bad as butting into a thread hijacking its intent to just disagree with the poster about how much they would love to fly an A-10 in VTOL. But, there are rude and uncaring people in the world, it could happen I suppose.

Many of us would LOVE to fly an A-10. Or one MUCH more like the A-10, like the Mod was, than what is in the sim already.

Me, I would LOVE to fly an A-10 in there. Yup, that would be a FINE aircraft.
A really sweet ride that A-10. I would pay perhaps $20 for such a fine aircraft as an A-10 alright.
Apparently quite a few other VTOL Investors have posted how much they would love one too. Kindred spirits now doubt. Good people I am sure of it☺!
Mmmmn Hmmmnnn.
☺

[freeformsage102]

Wouldn't mind an Arma 3 A-164 Wipeout, the 5th gen redux of the Lighting II.

Unique features it can have/share with others:

Buddy lazing
HUD SOI
HMCS SOI
SPI (Sensor Point of Interest)
Expanded networking mechanics for the SPIs to be shareable between all networked allies
Expanded weapons delivery options: spread of cluster munitions
HARM pod, vastly enhancing Anti-radiation weaponry
Assuming it isn't already, off-bore HMCS targeting for the SIDEarm
Hell, how about a near cut and paste inclusion of a Falcon 3/4/BMS style truly dynamic campaign, and the Durandal introduced to see just what effect shutting an airbase down has on a militaries success rates

I could go on

[Wales Grey]

Nguyên văn bởi freeformsage102:

Wouldn't mind an Arma 3 A-164 Wipeout, the 5th gen redux of the Lighting II.

Unique features it can have/share with others:

Buddy lazing
HUD SOI
HMCS SOI
SPI (Sensor Point of Interest)
Expanded networking mechanics for the SPIs to be shareable between all networked allies
Expanded weapons delivery options: spread of cluster munitions
HARM pod, vastly enhancing Anti-radiation weaponry
Assuming it isn't already, off-bore HMCS targeting for the SIDEarm

Of these features, the only ones that I think are both missing and would be very beneficial for implementation are Buddy Lazing and Network SPI/GPS Target. HARM pods/Pre-Planned targets for HARMS/Target Discrimination would be nice but don't really add any beneficial mechanical systems that the current ARAD page doesn't already provide in a more automated system.

Nguyên văn bởi freeformsage102:

Hell, how about a near cut and paste inclusion of a Falcon 3/4/BMS style truly dynamic campaign, and the Durandal introduced to see just what effect shutting an airbase down has on a militaries success rates

Given how completely different the engines for VTOL VR and Falcon are - to the point where asking for features from one to be "brought over" is de facto meaningless. Implementing a dynamic campaign engine ala Falcon BMS would require developing, implementing, and debugging the following components in VTOL VR:

• extremely large maps - like twice to thrice the size
  
• "reality bubble" culling - Falcon does not simulate objects beyond about... 200(?) nautical miles, and instead basically rolls dice for everything players aren't close enough to care about.
  
• airbase health for runway status
  
• airbase inventories
  
• logistics scripting/logic for resupplies
  
• logistics art assets
  
• logistics flight models (even a basic one) for the cargo planes
  
• implementable logistics paths on a map-by-map basis or in a general sense
  
• (more) destructible buildings
  
• additional weapon logic for hurting runways
  
• some kind of system for preventing spawns at """destroyed""" runways
  
• mission planning module
  
• automatic mission waypoint generation logic
  
• scripting for evaluating mission success
  
• 24-hour simulation system
  
• intervention system for players to enter at X time on Y unit
  
• interruptions for all of the above based on what occurs in simulated events or in-game
  
• And a bunch of other stuff I'm probably forgetting

[Wales Grey]

Nguyên văn bởi Rockethead293:

you unfilled target water bottle the last post was almost a year ago
also you arent allowed to make helicopters and multicrew because those use paid elements

The real issue is that you can't use code from the DLCs that provide helicopter/multicrew functionality. There's nothing stopping people from doing helicopters and multicrew mods, except that they'd have to write totally new code for both features and then integrate it into VTOL VR, without mucking up the existing helicopter/multicrew code. Which is a lot more work than "just" doing an aircraft and a fight model and a cockpit and animations and-

[Hijong park]

Nguyên văn bởi Wales Grey:

Nguyên văn bởi Rockethead293:

you unfilled target water bottle the last post was almost a year ago
also you arent allowed to make helicopters and multicrew because those use paid elements

The real issue is that you can't use code from the DLCs that provide helicopter/multicrew functionality. There's nothing stopping people from doing helicopters and multicrew mods, except that they'd have to write totally new code for both features and then integrate it into VTOL VR, without mucking up the existing helicopter/multicrew code. Which is a lot more work than "just" doing an aircraft and a fight model and a cockpit and animations and-

At that point it's better to make a flight sim myself, which I'm doing.

[『 ❀ Rin ❀ 』]

Nguyên văn bởi Rockethead293:

you unfilled target water bottle the last post was almost a year ago
also you arent allowed to make helicopters and multicrew because those use paid elements

thats such a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ reasoning when there are clear ways to lock said modded aircraft if users do not own the dlc. simple. so again, restricting modding capabilities due to dlc is the dumbest reason ive seen so far.

[Rockethead293]

Nguyên văn bởi Wales Grey:

Nguyên văn bởi Rockethead293:

you unfilled target water bottle the last post was almost a year ago
also you arent allowed to make helicopters and multicrew because those use paid elements

The real issue is that you can't use code from the DLCs that provide helicopter/multicrew functionality. There's nothing stopping people from doing helicopters and multicrew mods, except that they'd have to write totally new code for both features and then integrate it into VTOL VR, without mucking up the existing helicopter/multicrew code. Which is a lot more work than "just" doing an aircraft and a fight model and a cockpit and animations and-

look at this message