VTOL VR
此主题已被锁定
grove 2020 年 3 月 4 日 下午 12:56
SU 27/YAK 41M (or Yak 141) please?
Title says it all, we need Russian jets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R18uBA-QfY
最后由 grove 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 4 日 下午 12:57
< >
正在显示第 16 - 26 条,共 26 条留言
Dankan37 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 5:19 
引用自 grove
引用自 Dankan37
I have 500 hours on DCS, I do like it a lot.

A Su-27 pushing a F15C away doesn't mean anything, let's talk about budgets instead... Russia has a poor economy, most of their jets are outdated Soviet ones which were refitted.
Go back to BORZZIKMAN circle-jerk.
>Poor economy
Yeah i saw that on CNN
>most of their jets are outdated Soviet ones which were refitted
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D0%BA-130
Well at least you tried
>I have 500 hours on DCS, I do like it a lot.
So you admit superiority of Russian simulator game development? Good.

>Poor economy: Economy based on oil exports, has the GDP of the Benelux region, also low GDP per capita. Russia's military spending is lower than France...

>Jets outdated: Russia barely has developed new jets in the last years, most of them are old Soviet ones with minor updates, MFCD, "Better" radars and some new weapons systems.
Don't get me started on the weapons btw...

>500 Hours on DCS: Bruh did you even play it? The best jets in the game are the western ones, there are no professional eastern ones...
Also, it's a good simulator but that doesn't mean russians are superior at game developing, just look at steam's lowest rated games.
grove 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 5:40 
引用自 Dankan37
引用自 grove
>Poor economy
Yeah i saw that on CNN
>most of their jets are outdated Soviet ones which were refitted
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%AF%D0%BA-130
Well at least you tried
>I have 500 hours on DCS, I do like it a lot.
So you admit superiority of Russian simulator game development? Good.

>Poor economy: Economy based on oil exports, has the GDP of the Benelux region, also low GDP per capita. Russia's military spending is lower than France...

>Jets outdated: Russia barely has developed new jets in the last years, most of them are old Soviet ones with minor updates, MFCD, "Better" radars and some new weapons systems.
Don't get me started on the weapons btw...

>500 Hours on DCS: Bruh did you even play it? The best jets in the game are the western ones, there are no professional eastern ones...
Also, it's a good simulator but that doesn't mean russians are superior at game developing, just look at steam's lowest rated games.
You literally dumped your own argument
>France
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcyLII6Xd9w
https://youtu.be/56b_rmUHUg4
Don't get me started on this third world country XD
All their military spending are going to building more refugee camps as it seems like
>Don't get me started on the weapons btw...
Do it
>Bruh did you even play it?
Better question is DID YOU play it? I'm not hiding my profile.
>Also, it's a good simulator but that doesn't mean russians are superior at game developing, just look at steam's lowest rated games.
Bruh. STALKER, Metro 2033, The Void, WarThunder, IL-2 series, Crossout, Pathologic 1/2, Heroes of might and magic, i can go on and on, but probably nobody tells you that in TIME journal. You better get back to call of duty where nothing ever changes from year to year.
最后由 grove 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 5:42
grove 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 6:20 
引用自 Dankan37
I am unsubscribing from this discussion, you are a really brainwashed person and I hope you snap out of everything. At the end I won, because you're hiding behing crappy logicical arguments.
It's funny that some people belive a nation whose doctrine is based on making false claims (Maskirovka).
Other than that, russian planes are garbage and so are their weapons system.

Also......Your SUPER DUPER AMAZING HYPER Pantsir was destroyed by a turkish drone HAHAHA OMFG.

Best regards, USA.
>It's funny that some people belive a nation whose doctrine is based on making false claims
Talking a dude whose planes tactics spin around fire and forget and stealth mechanics. Your pilots are cowards and they know it. In dogfight your planes are dead in no time.
>Maskirovka
What does this even mean?
>At the end i won
Being delusional is hell of a drug. That's like USA announced to be the single and only winner in WW2 yet done almost nothing in comparison to USSR.
>Russian planes are garbage and so are their weapon systems
Yet your pilots and soldiers wet their pants each time, our ammunition is far more superior.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFs8EzJyhDs
Open your profile, you haven't even proved your point.
>You're brainwashed
Yet your country funds CNN, Time, Guardian, BBC news, CBS news and all the brainwashing media.
Next time learn how to lose in an argument without losing your face x)
最后由 grove 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 6:37
lorenzo!!! 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 9:48 
140 Yak-130s built as of 2017... Lmaooooo. Leave you gremlin
grove 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 10:48 
引用自 lorenzo
140 Yak-130s built as of 2017... Lmaooooo. Leave you gremlin
(Produced 1989–1990) Lockheed YF-22-->F-22-->Lockheed Martin X-35-->F-35 (Source - wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_X-35 design section)
Fighting your own shadow again. Time to get back to CNN.
最后由 grove 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 10:48
grove 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 11:42 
Uh oh. Failure-35 proves itself to be a big fraud on HX challenge 2020, just in time.
https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/finns-analyzing-fighter-trials-data
"Puranen did not say which aircraft suffered shortcomings, although he questioned why four F-35s were sent for the deployment but only two arrived. He noted that one was subsequently unserviceable.
“It [the F-35] could not fly all flights. The other flew all the flights,” he told the newspaper. Finnish media have questioned why such a large footprint was sent with the aircraft, as well as the tanker that supported the flight across the Atlantic.""
>when you send 4 planes to cross the pound but only two actually arrives at destination and merely one perfoms the test
https://youtu.be/xgDZNXHs6KY
There you can examine
最后由 grove 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 8 日 上午 11:53
David D. Davidson 2020 年 3 月 8 日 下午 12:01 
This place gives me autism.
AkaiSuisei 2020 年 3 月 8 日 下午 12:14 
>all those amerifats
F-22 is an overpriced hangar queen which will never enter mass production and F-35 is the greatest scam since Bernard Meidoff
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/302884842708795392/686288753970642985/1583436223773.png
>the entire construction is overweight, so there would be less ammo avalible for the pilot
>stealth coating that goes off
>weak results during training fights
最后由 AkaiSuisei 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 8 日 下午 12:18
lorenzo!!! 2020 年 3 月 8 日 下午 2:09 
The X-35 is not comparable to what you linked. But thank you for the effort.
snarF 2020 年 3 月 8 日 下午 2:17 
>First of all, the lack of the advanced active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar on their F-15s. Second, the air engagements typically involved six Eagles against up to eighteen IAF aircraft with no chance to simulate any beyond visual range (BVR) missile shot (due to the Indian request of not using the AMRAAM).

Furthermore, the Indians had sent their most experienced airmen to fight against the Americans whereas the latter belonged to a standard squadron (hence there was a mix of experienced and less experienced pilots).

This is copied from one of your articles ♥♥♥♥♥♥. The Americans willingly gave up every advantage they had for the exercise. Funny you would forget to mention that.
grove 2020 年 3 月 10 日 上午 5:45 
引用自 FaT snarF
This is copied from one of your articles ♥♥♥♥♥♥. The Americans willingly gave up every advantage they had for the exercise. Funny you would forget to mention that.
https://aviationweek.com/defense-space/finns-analyzing-fighter-trials-data
Rusky? If you knew this isn't an insult to us, quite opposite. Lack of education hits you hard murica.
>Willingly gave up
HAHA bullsнit. Next time they're going to lose all their gears on the way to battlefield anyway like they do every single year x)
Enjoy your bootleg planes
最后由 grove 编辑于; 2020 年 3 月 10 日 上午 5:48
< >
正在显示第 16 - 26 条,共 26 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2020 年 3 月 4 日 下午 12:56
回复数: 26