Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Your HDD is your private property which they downloaded content onto it in agreement with their license they issued to you to play the game.
You are defined as a licensor due to having bought the game, what you receive as part of that license is down to KT
Whatever they sent you when your downloaded the game is yours to use unless that license is revoked or until they change their terms and conditions however any changes to Terms and Conditions must be agreed upon by a user (usually by receiving a new "Do You agree" page)
Also as your tool is basically like GTA's Open IV in that its simply a tool to let other people use it how they wish they'd run into the same exact problems that idiot who tried to shut down Open IV ran into.
Getting entangled in legal issues can be a serious life problem, so it's always prudent as a developer to follow the EULA as much as possible.
I think the guy who wrote FAR for Nier Automata has a pretty good track record of trying to follow EULAs; this does explain why he chooses to work on some games and not others. Koei Tecmo's blanket prohibition of modding or even analysing the game is a reason not to work on the game.
It's the publisher's discretion to enforce the EULA; they are very likely to turn a blind eye to people modding the game to fix a bug or enhance performance/features. I'm not so sure they will turn a blind eye to people modding a game to get access to licensed content that they aren't entitled to.
They're most likely to come after those who brazenly show how to do so, and also developers if they're (Koei Tecmo) silly. This is why my stance is, I don't condone the use of my tools for EULA violations, but I can't control it. And even if they asked me to take it down, I've open sourced it, so it would not really accomplish anything.
Now someone mod in a Madoka Magica outfit please
lol
They aren't laws
Most of them actually infringe actual laws from many countries when regarding consumer rights or digital laws.
I only ever hear of courts taking EULAs seriously in the US.
What the OP describes is tottaly legal depending where you live.
In some places digital data can be owned, but not replicated or sold for profit, for example.
Yeah, well... unfortunately, I live in the US, and this DLC piracy mod paints a target on my back, so...
If they're silly enough to try to DMCA my work, I'll counter-notice because I believe it to be clean room reverse engineering. But after that it'll be court...
Hopefully someone will make an all out (quality) nude mod
What is a18_decrypt.exe and where can i download it?