Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You'll see LMMS and FL Studio are very different things from Rytmik. Both Rytmik and FL Studio are good for different things, but Rytmik notably has fewer features for a wide variety of reasons (largely technical). Being a groovebox, Rytmik enables a more creative approach to music-production than most DAWs can offer - however it also makes certain tasks difficult like creating complex, harmonic notes. It's also unlikely that Rytmik will ever support VSTs and soundfonts.
So it's largely a matter of preference, but I think most users would prefer to have access to both instead of being limited to only one. I do highly recommend trying out LMMS if you are interested in FL Studio though.
But to answer your question, the main thing that FL Studio (and any other DAW) does that this doesn't is allow you to use plugins which are third party instruments, effects and utilities. There are many free plugins out there as well as low cost ones in sales. You can spend thousands on good plugins if you want and you get serious about your music.
There are other things you can do in FL Studio that you can't do in this but the main one is using plugins. Search for FL Studio tutorials on youtube if you want to see typical workflows in FL.