Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
if it held 100 ... ok.
40? ... nope.
I have to disappointingly agree. I was so stoked for it when they teased it, but after finding out the space it has, super bummed. It even looks like it should hold more. And to take the space of 3 wall stacked chests (20 each, 60 total)... I hope it gets updated, soon.
Agreed.
You can place 4 large chests giving 80 storage in the same floor and wall space that 1 new storage takes up for 40 storage, plus it costs rare materials to build.
Looks nice, but only gives half the storage it should do really.
You can squeeze in 4 stacked chests if you pack them real tight :)
It looks good, il give them that, but why pay so much more for something half as good.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2255289268
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2257156885
Keeping up with the 80 storage space per level.
Ultimately, chests are still much convenient to use, and for placements.