Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Oh yeah I was watching that. He actually got worried it was going to look too empty at one point XD
https://imgur.com/a/89OAlLS
this is my Pena.
yet you can fit all 59 species on Nublar... with like a quarter/nearly half of the map free entirely with no planning. Come the ♥♥♥♥ on man, if you're gonna lie at least make it believable. The arguments that Herrersaurus and Proceratosaurus are reskins are blatantly false; Dreadnoughtus, acro and Carchar I can understand. But really?
To make individual animations to each and every dinosaur would be far too painstaking, thus the reason why so many dinosaurs share animations with other dinosaurs that happen to have similar body shapes. If you were to group every dinosaur animations via body shape you would find that a lot of these categories would have about one or two dinosaurs (I.E. Apatosaurus and Diplodocus). Very few dinosaurs are entirely unique, like Troodon and Herraresaurus, but please keep in mind that this was done due to technical and scientific reasons and not out of laziness.
Moreover, to add to this, I have even found that just because two dinosaurs share an animation set does not mean they all have the same animations. Take the Acro mentioned in Whiteshark01's post, the Acro has a unique headbutt animation that isn't seen on any other previously released dinosaur. So if you take out every dinosaur that has a single unique animation and classify them as a "unique" then you have an even bigger list of unique animals. This doesn't just apply to the DLC dinos and hybrids either. Dilophosaurus belongs in this category too, and I'm pretty sure there are a few more, but I don't exactly have the time to go looking.
The maps really are not small at all.
Some are, yes. But as has been pointed out, Pena can easily fit 6 enclosures and probably more if you squeeze a bit.
I don't think I've filled a single map completely except Pena. All the other maps I always have room to spare. The maps really are plenty big.
The new Nublar North map is also quite huge.
And some people forget that having restrictions makes for interesting gameplay. This is just how it works. Having no restrictions at all will get boring pretty quick. Smaller maps will force people to be creative and make more unique parks at the same time because they have to work with the terrain instead of ignoring it completely.
That being said. It could still be interesting to have an even bigger sandbox map for those that want it. So people can make their dream parks. But for the standard campaign the maps really are completely fine as they are.
I would be pleased enough if they could make unique animations for Stegosaurs, Ceratopsians, Hadrosaurs, Ankylosaurs and then have them all 2-3 animations for the same action.
That in and of itself should create enough variety in the animation department which would liven the animals up a lot more instead of them being animatronics that can only do a single thing. Nothing irks me more than seeing an Anykosaur lumber around slower than a snail and then jump into action like it's a puppy on too much cuddles.