Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Yes Dimetrodon, pterosaurs and Mosasaurs are canon. But we can be at least sure that we cannot expect these any time soon. But you never know if Frontier/Universal changes their minds.
Correct, although Dimetrodon was synapsid.
Yeah there have never been, neither will there ever be mammals in a Jurassic Park movie, nor do we need them in this game. Perhaps if they ever make a non license game. But they have no place in a Jurassic Park game.
They're not adding fish, they're adding an object with fish in it on a single animation.
That's different from adding an animal that roams a body of water of x-size and has to interact with said body of water and with other animals in or around said body of water.
The first thing is easy peasy considering it's just a building. The second thing is more than that.
Seriously...Why are people using the word canon to describe extinct animals in a universe where the only difference is their advanced genetic abilities? You'd almost say the Elephant isn't "canon" in JP/JW because we haven't seen one, or that Kangaroos don't exist, or that Egypt doesn't exist as a country simply because there's no mention of it....
No worries, it happens quite often.