Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Elven Curve Blade is a martial weapon for an Elf. You aren't automatically proficient with any weapons other than the specific ones listed.
This means if you are usin ga class that doesn't have Martial Weapon Proficiency you need to take it (you don't have to take exotic, and martial is moe weapon unlocks it's preferable)
As for being Finessable: That's the perk of the sword. It's a Finessable Bastard Sword (that has to be wielded 2H) essentially. Well it's kind of an upgraded Scimitar >.< Pathfinder is a lot looser with how it "values" weapons than I would like.
As the others have stated, as an Elf, you need the Martial Proficiency if you don't have it already. Any other race would have to spend a Feat tax for Martial then Exotic to use the same weapon. The same goes for Harrim with Dwarven weapons and Reg with Orcish weapons.
Unless we're talking about a non-English translation the tooltip is not in any way misleading. It states you are proficient with certain weapon types, and that you treat any weapon with "elven" in its name as martial.
It does not, in any way imply, you automatically have proficiency with those weapons if you don't have Martial Proficiency. In fact I don't think there's any way to make the tooltip any more clear.
But now it's clear. Thx to all who clariefied it for me :)
When I first read that tooltip, in relation to Reg in my case, back in September, it was much less clear. I do not recall the words "martial proficiency" appearing there at that time.
I spend, literally, all day explaining to people what statements mean. These people are not so much dumb as they are unwilling to think about the statements actual meaning.
Reading is a skill. The more you do it, and the more you actually think about what you're reading, the better you get and the fewer times you'll be confused.
Edit: I think it's been hotfixed to use the actual PnP description since then. Originally I'm pretty sure they (the devs) wrote the desriptions (for themselves) and translated over rather than using the standard PnP formats.
That's what I needed.... an arrogant elitist, who losses no opportunity to belittle others...
No. A simple advice is "look at the tooltip once more. You will find that it is a martial weapon instead of exotic.". What you did wasnt arrogant either, it was just not helpful at all and you were being an arse...
Simple advice. It helps to just answer questions and maybe point out that the answer was out there all along, but not being sarcastic while doing so. Or shutting up is an alternative, in your case it might have been the better one.
Yup....always blame the others, never take responsibility... like a certain president :)
Tuck Frump!
The very first post I made in the thread. My second was saying tha tthe tooltip was not confusing (to someone else who was remembering it being more vague around release). My third was a responce to the OP calling himself dumb.
Which was to say that reading is a skill. I deal with poeple daily who don't understand sataments. Best way to get better is to think about the statements you're reading.
That was. In fact. Simple advice.
He got all defensive because I said that
"I have often found it is not a matter of intelligence but a matter of how much reading is actually being done."
I was not, as you put it, being an arse. The VERY FIRST thing I did in the thread was to answer his question. The second was to tell him that the question wasn't about him being dumb.