Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqP82dbtk4k
Also, executing people, even bad people is somekind considered Evil... what I really disagree...
But it is a nowdays game with the social thinking of nowadays that try to simulate a fantasy medieval time, so obviously it would cause some issues in this matter.
But somethings like honor offending would be gladly rewarded with death in lots of cultures in antique times without your character being considered Evil for it.
Though the game's social thinking is mostly based from Paizo's original writings (considering stuff like how Amiri's entire thing is taken almost entirely from her original tabletop canon depiction), with Owlcat just extending on it.
True Neutral is basically half of dialogue options compared to others since you lack Good/Evil/Lawful/Chaotic for their exclusive choices.
I enjoyed the most LN, and mixes of Evil. LG was also fun in the crusading against evil sense.