Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's awful.. why even bother testing then
Modern game development practices are supposed to be all about iterative design through testing
Absolutely agree. I'd be fine with a nerfed AoE radius on Stone Call here. The fun in playing a spellcaster comes from the satisfaction of using your limited spells in an efficient manner, and being practically unable to cast Stone Call without damaging yourself clearly runs counter to that
Links to the research?
Right? I was hoping for some links to these sources that claim they didn't listen they PAID them to do.
?
I'm steam level 70 and own over 500 games lol