Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
...3GB is fairly low for this game tho. In the demo you could barely get away with 2gb vram on Low TRAM setting but in the full game it's probably harsher.
you dont even remotely understand how things work it seems..... on max settings it will use like 90% of ur VRAM as quickly as it gets it loaded from ur HDD/SSD. this results in more details in textures and decreases loading times by quiet a bit when loading "similar" areas.
having more % USAGE of VRAM do not affect performance at all. in this game a higher setting result in more details, but this is the only reason why u are losing fps. its not about how much load in VRAM u get.
that is also not true, since there are many 900 series user out there with TRAM on max and all is fine.
that is not true? ^^ give me ur source of "the last 0.5GB of VRAM in 970 is horrigly slow" xD. gonna wait for it bro. a looong time ^^
I actually received a $30 class action settlement due to the flaw.
"pcgamer" xD come dude.^^
I'll never consider lowering my resolution to 720p, I shall make a thread and ♥♥♥♥♥ around instead!
It's been a long time since I read about all that hoopla surrounding that care tho, what people were most angry about is being lied to re: how much high vram there was and the stats of the card.
you got the settlement due miss information at point of sale the 970 in all fairness was a good card at the time and worked and performed as nvidia intended and still isn't terrible now i used to run 2x 970 in sli and i can't rember noticing the slower 0.5 ram ever causing me problems
What he's talking about is true, was a widely reported issue and discussed on youtube etc, people got money from the lawsuit that ensued.