Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hows the graphics? No different?
I play in 2560x1080 with black bars for ultrawide on 1440p monitor instead though.
there is, but not that much tbh.
Is that the same with other games? Not much difference from 1080p to 1440p?
Hmm im confused now.
Stay in 1080p and not spend any money
Upgrade to 1440p and spend $900 (monitor and GPU)
Also I noticed a lot of difference from 720p to 1080p. But I havent test 1440p yet. So im not sure
That's the reason 1080p is still the most popular format. It makes sense for developers to keep that as the "target" format, and all other formats as "add-on" to that target format. It's not that great for people that use higher formats, but it makes a lot of sense buisness-wise.
That said - While I personally are more than happy with my 24 inch 1080p screen, I can imagine that other people with 1440p or higher feel a bit "left in the cold".
Have you played in 720p? The jump from 720p to 1080p is huge for me since i have been gaming in 720p before.
Is the jump from 720p to 1080p is as big as 1080p to 1440p?
---hope this helps, it's late for me. got to get some rest. later.
really? in your case, i think its math issue instead of "optimization". 1080p has 2,073,600 pixels where 1440p has 3,686,400 pixels. That's a whopping 77% increase in pixels that your system needs to render. Assuming you are capped at 60fps, 15fps is a 25% hit on performance, that, to me, is still a dammned good price to pay for a 77% resolution increase.
This, is another big questions with tonnes of variables, apart from reso, what size is your monitor? what "settings" do you mean? medium preset vs highest preset can significantly impact quality on higher reso vs lower reso.
If you're doing 1080p on a 24-27" it doesnt makes much difference, but if you're doing 1080p on a 32", its horrendous. Afterall, there's only so much pixels your eyes can see.
Personally, i have 3 main rigs that a alternate around home, 4k being on a 50" TV at my hall, 1440p on 32" being my main gaming station, while 1080p on a 40" TV on my lounge.
With 4k pack installed, 100% scaling works absolutely well on 1440p and 4k with minor to no difference at higher scaling with the exception of 1080p. The 1080p has to have rendering upscale to at least 150% to eliminate the weird heavily aliased hair.