Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This thread is a bit old but the later posts are more up to date
I do not worry about score in single player games myself - but nope Green is not good
Veteran: 320,000 points
Elite: 480,000 points
Legendary: 720,000 points
Kerensky: 784,000 points
I do not know if the ranks up to Elite have changed. but can confirm that the last two are:
Legendary: 640,000 points.
Kerenski: 760,000 points.
So time for another Campaign mode, the way I once again what to play the game :)
Yeah, my last Career the multiplier was 0.85. Definitely allows for a higher score. :)
(I'm quite annoyed that Ironman is worth a whole 0.2, because I'm never going to use that setting. /sigh)
Ironman should maybe be worth 0,8-1,0, just a thought as it sound very difficult.
The biggest risk is something going wrong with a save and losing your game entirely. And that isn't something that's likely to happen either, so mostly it just saves you the hassle of deleting the excess saves that build up.
But if you're playing casually, having more saves is definitely more fun, lets you goof off more.
"CareerRankScoreMinimums" : [
0,
80000,
160000,
320000,
480000,
640000,
760000
],