Poor Performance?

[Freelancer]

I have a Ryzen 5 2600 and an RX 5600 XT but with 64 bots it rarely gets above 50 fps. Is this normal? No mods, just vanilla.

[ADN]

This isn't normal, even if the game still in developpment. The video settings may be too hight, try to change them.

[Freelancer]

Originally posted by Sydney:

This isn't normal, even if the game still in developpment. The video settings may be too hight, try to change them.

What setting? I don't see a game with this graphics demanding too much even with the highest settings tbh.

[ADN]

I know, but Ravenfield is VERY poorly optimized. Try to put the graphics on normal and modify the vegetation draw distance.

[Emu]

That usually works

[boris.glevrk]

I don't even know how much FPS I'm getting.... how do you check?
I mean.... I try to compare with my own performance but I need a number to compare with.

[ADN]

F11 or something like this

[Freelancer]

Originally posted by boris.glevrk:

I don't even know how much FPS I'm getting.... how do you check?
I mean.... I try to compare with my own performance but I need a number to compare with.

You could also go to Steam settings and then set the steam overlay to display your FPS.

[pregnant man]

I'm having the same problem. I can barely get 25-35 fps while playing on Archipelago with 60 bots, 15 mods, and the LITERAL LOWEST settings even though I can also literally run Warframe, Titanfall 2, Battlefield 4, Battlefield 5, Battlefield 1, and Battlefront 2 (all gorgeous AAA games) on high/ultra settings at 75 fps.

My specs are on my profile.

[ADN]

It's weird. I can run it with mods and good settings with only a i3 2.4 GHz

[Emu]

I use my ♥♥♥♥♥♥ Lenovo school computer and i can run it barely averagely but I can still run it.

[Freelancer]

Originally posted by Sydney:

It's weird. I can run it with mods and good settings with only a i3 2.4 GHz

What's your average FPS?

[Freelancer]

Originally posted by average r/ravenfield user:

I'm having the same problem. I can barely get 25-35 fps while playing on Archipelago with 60 bots, 15 mods, and the LITERAL LOWEST settings even though I can also literally run Warframe, Titanfall 2, Battlefield 4, Battlefield 5, Battlefield 1, and Battlefront 2 (all gorgeous AAA games) on high/ultra settings at 75 fps.

My specs are on my profile.

I know right? And the weird thing is that my old school laptop runs Ravenfield just the same as my actual gaming desktop despite my PC having superior specs in every way.

[ADN]

Originally posted by Joey:

Originally posted by Sydney:

It's weird. I can run it with mods and good settings with only a i3 2.4 GHz

What's your average FPS?

60 fps

[boris.glevrk]

Originally posted by Sydney:

Originally posted by Joey:

What's your average FPS?

60 fps

60 is like the FPS upper limit...
I used F11 and checked, looks like my game would go between 50 and 15 when heavily modded (50 when minimum load, 15 when facing a LOT of modded objects)
My GPU is RTX 1660

[Leader of the Zakonistians]

Originally posted by Sydney:

I know, but Ravenfield is VERY poorly optimized. Try to put the graphics on normal and modify the vegetation draw distance.

I'm on lowest graphics settings and I still usually average between 40 and 50 FPS the official maps can give me 60FPS or more but most of the modded maps at best are 40FPS