Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's better to begin with 3rd, 1st might confuse newbies more. Plus, 3rd game is hard but good start.
A prequel imo is meant to flesh out something you already experienced, not serve as an introduction.
By the way, plot of the both games is good.
Anyway DMC is not a complex series. There is no wrong order for people to play them in since events hardly ever require knowledge of a previous game.
You may skip DMC2 because its the worst of the 3 if you want. But its still worth a shot.
“DMC0” what are you on about?
Are you implying that DmC has anything to do with these games?
Also forget 4 unless you are a tryhard...
I have no words for that.
WTF is DMC Donte May Doouche??? (we don't acknowledge that ones existence)
DMC3 is 0 we never got 3 and 4 is half a game that has invincible enemies and other BS while splitting Dantes moveset into 2 with the inclusion of Nero the Crybaby whos devil arm should of been another weapon for Dante.
Enjoy your tryhard chess mini game in 3 and 4 that makes you redo the whole thing if you fail.
I personally recommend 1, then 3, then 4, then DmC if you want to try something different.