Did you tried that on AMD FX processor?

[[‡]=Storky=[‡]]

Old Specs
- AMD FX-8350 OC to 4400MHz
- 8Gb DDR3 1866MHz single module
- GTX1050Ti (a bit OC)
- Win10

New Specs
- Intel Core i5-12400
- overkill motherboard MSI MAG B760M Mortar
- Kingston FURY Beast 2x8Gb DDR5 6000MHz
- same GTX1050Ti
- Win11

I tested Mordhau on these old and new son's PC 1-2 years ago
On AMD system FPS was barely 60 and it felt slow and trembling
Since AMD was overclocked i thought GPU is too weak

Then I run it on newer Intel system, and all goes just smooth and fine
Also my friend has professional Ryzen CPU and the same GTX1050Ti , he enjoys the game on ultras without FPS issues.


I have a feeling that AMD FX lacks some instructions to be capable to run games on UT4 engine.

[Draco2127]

maybe its because the gtx 1050ti is almost 10 years old... get a new gpu

[[‡]=Storky=[‡]]

Originally posted by Draco2127:

maybe its because the gtx 1050ti is almost 10 years old... get a new gpu

lol

[Liam2349]

The game is both GPU and CPU heavy. With an i7-8700k I would play around 100FPS. With a Ryzen 7950X3D, on the cache cores, I can play at a locked average of 236FPS (my frame limit). On the frequency cores, I average about 140FPS or so.

The cache cores evidently can push even higher and would probably hit the built-in 250FPS limit.

FX-8350 was always problematic. I had one at the time. I remember upgrading to an i5-4670k to double my frame rate in Battlefield.

[[‡]=Storky=[‡]]

Originally posted by Liam2349:

The game is both GPU and CPU heavy. With an i7-8700k I would play around 100FPS. With a Ryzen 7950X3D, on the cache cores, I can play at a locked average of 236FPS (my frame limit). On the frequency cores, I average about 140FPS or so.

The cache cores evidently can push even higher and would probably hit the built-in 250FPS limit.

FX-8350 was always problematic. I had one at the time. I remember upgrading to an i5-4670k to double my frame rate in Battlefield.

By your tests looks like the game benefits from more than 4 cores. Surprising, I thought UT4 engine has mediocre support of multiple threads

Btw Battlefield, porbably the most games of the series, had the best multithread support I've ever seen. It always was the best looking game running smooth on my FX-6100 and FX-8350 :D Same credits to Doom2016. Because FX cpus had nice summary power, but it never could be realized in games.

[Liam2349]

I don't think it benefits from many cores, but I will try to remember to check. The X3D CPUs tend to be faster in games when running on their cache cores.

Also I'm actually running around 224FPS, due to using Nvidia Reflex now, which caps the frame rate lower.

[midnai]

I used to play with an FX 8350 and a RX 580, invasion servers lowered my fps and sometimes i had stutters even on low so i stayed mostly in duel servers