Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Considering the game has bots, I was surprised none of them were tested with the classic "fill the server with bots" test and see who wins more.
I''ve seen both sides win on all the maps. One side isn't favored over another. All you're experiencing is being apart of a trash team and the unfortunate luck to have one team form up of idiots over and over again in the lobby. That's literally all it is. An uncontrollable thing that can happen.
I've heard people say the snowy map favors blue, then see red win a bunch. Then next server I see blue win a bunch on the same map. It's all down to the players making up the team, and not the maps fault.
Stop blaming the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ maps for player incompetence. Idiots struggling to work as a team in online games has been a thing since the dawn of the internet.
Blue has a push objective which focuses the team on a point. It makes the mode function more as intended with an objective, and red's side is just flail around and try and knock down the camp. That's easier to get unfocused.
In short, the team ends up playing the objective as a side-effect of kill hunting.
Taiga - 50/50
Mountain Peak - blue 90/10 red
Crossroads - 50/50
Grad - blue 70/30 red
Camp - blue 40/60 red