Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This has been discussed to death. People don't seem to agree on what is a roguelike.
According to Wikipedia, Stoneshard is a roguelike in every sense and I stand by it.
Some important differences between Diablo and Stoneshard:
Diablo
Hack and slash RPG / standard Action RPG
Standard saving
Fixed linear quests (Diablo 1 and 2 at least, haven't played Diablo 3)
Stoneshard
Turn-based RPG
(Optional) Permadeath and savespots
Randomly generated contracts
These things said, yes, Stoneshard is inspired by Diablo, the devs said so themselves in the Kickstarter page. But saying Stoneshard is a 2D Diablo is an understatement, they are both unique games with some similarities and that's it.
There have been people here saying they cant go back to ToME or ADOM after playing the bliss of stoneshard and i agree with them.
I personally dont care what it is genre wise, its somewhere in the rpg rogue field and the best singleplayer/single protagonist turnbased game i have ever played. And i played a metric ♥♥♥ ton of games over many years now.
Game is totaly different than the Diablo series. Specially nothing like the arcade imbecileness of D3. If u play it like it (as some people do) u will get rekt.
If you pay attention, the people saying Stoneshard is not a roguelike, they never mention the reason they think that way. They just say "it's not", they don't say why. I'm saying why it's a roguelike according to a standard definition of roguelikes. People are welcome to disagree if they think differently, but simply saying "it's not" is pointless.
I guess that some people are looking for a Rogueclone, not a roguelike. Stoneshard is as much roguelike as other games are souls-like, without being souls-clone.
There's also a new APRG called Wolcen, worth checking out. (Haven't played it myself though)
PoE is great.
I played 20h in Grim Dawn with a melee character, I didn't see a lot of gunpowder, never reached my attention. Not a single enemy using that as far as I recall. However, I could have just overlooked it by accident.
I really dig dark ARPGs like the first Diablo, and I would totally play more games like that if they were available.
sure there are honorable mentions but nothing like it.
speaking of recomendations:
If u basically like the gameplay of skyrim but didnt like the arcadeness and dumbed down ness of the base game and are more into the old gothic style of first person rpgs, i can wholeheartedly recommend the Requiem Mod with AZ Tweaks mod and permadeath, basic needs, hunterborn etc.
Some of the best times i ever had in hardcore RPG gaming in my life
That Mod combination basically taught me that gaming is not about the goal but about the journey and that did even inform my RL.
Sure most people know that phrase but really understanding it, letting it seep into you, becoming part of you; is something completly different.
Only very few people on the planet play Requiem with the AZ tweaks submod in permadeath mode, for us its the holy grail of realtime firstperson rpg gaming.
I rly do hope u buy the ticket and take the ride man.
There is nothing like it.
I feel like just telling them to go and watch gameplay of Rogue, or tell them to play Rogue would be enough.
It's almost like having people come and say that a game is a metroidvania, when they don't even know what Metroid or Castlevania is.