Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I own both version and the vr one even uses the same map as the original. The only difference is that it is in VR. That's it! There is no point playing superhot vr without vr since it would just be superhot...
Your the one who lacks understanding of the term let's look at the definitions
A particular form of something differing in certain respects from an earlier form or other forms of the same type of thing. Yep qualifies under that definition as a version
A particular edition or translation of a book or other work. Yep qualifies it is the VR Edition.
An adaptation of a novel, piece of music, etc., into another medium or style. Yep it's been adapted into VR whether you want to consider that a medium or style doesn't matter.
A particular release of a piece of computer software. It's the VR release so yep counts.
An account of a matter from a particular person's point of view. Doesn't apply here
So out of 5 definitions one doesn't apply and the rest can safely fall under the term version. Saying this isn't a version of the game is like saying Axis and Allies: 1941 and Axis and Allies: Pacific 1940 are not different versions of Axis. Just because something has different maps or uses alternate mechanics doesn't disqualify it from being a version. So stop trying to get super technical on people about a term when you yourself are technically incorrect. Not only that but even if their term was not completely accurate that does not somehow counter the point they are trying to make and if that's the only counter you have then you have lost the argument.
The whole point of games built specifically for VR is that they work best in VR. And especially with games designed around motion controls and allowing for interactions not possible with a mouse/keyboard or gamepad.
If one doesn't want to play VR games, there are already a boatload of non-VR games to choose from. Just play those.
I agree it's silly. I believe part of it is the human nature of wanting something you have been denied because you are denied it and not wanting to be left out. Also I think it's funny that they somehow all think that they can control three different entities with full axes simultaneously on a mouse and keyboard with any level of proficiency.
Well, you haven't played it - and I'm guessing you never will - so you'll never realize how preposterous your assumptions are. Just trust me that you're missing an incredible experience that the PC version doesn't come even close to replicating. SH VR is one of the most thrilling experiences I've ever had in VR.
So, yeah, very sad for you. :(
superhot VR is the SEQUEL to superhot, they are seperate games. like most sequels, it plays very much the same, but with diffrent levels, and some other minor changes.
hense why, they should atleast allow a non VR verson...
It's actually more of a spin off than a sequel.
either way, it's nothing if people cant actually play the game...
I seem to recall playing it. It's very playable. ;)
feel free to enlighten us on how to play on pc / non VR then, because even the dev's have stated you can't, even tho it would take only a super small mod to make it possible
You said that people can't actuall yplay the game. They can. With the required hardware. Like every other game in the market. If you don't have the hardware, get it or move on.