multiplayer?

[arrowsNL]

Hello, it is possible to make this game a multiplayer game because it would be quite fun to play with friends and to play with / against each other.
Greetings

[Dinoman]

I don't think that this game would work well as multiplayer since you can change anything, make as many or as few units as you want, and change them to be completely OP.

"Oh I'm bringing 5000 footmen, what did you bring?"

"Ten Chuck Norrises."

"..."

[Mrkillerhomer_xD]

Well, you could make it so anyone can join your game, and take control of a unit.
Or so you can invite a friend to come play with or against you. again taking control of a unit.
This way, i could setup a battle. then have people join in and change the flow of said battle.
I think this (if possible) could give the game a LOT of replay-ability.
Of course, i have no idea if something like this can even be done? (yet alone by ONE guy :O might be too much for him alone.)

[cloudninjakip]

couldnt you just use teamviewer with a friend and each make your own teams kinda like how some people did multiplayer battles for TABS

[Ultimate crapper]

They could... Just ban chuck Norris and people ypou made. And have like a sertin amount of cash or somthing

[Dr. Odenborg]

i think that this game is kinda cool just in single player but multiplayer WOULD BE AWESOME. tho there is a proplem. It could either be cool or unfair. Like : i have some heavy knights and foot men. What do you have? I have ten chunk norrises. THAT WOULD BE BAD, but multiplayer would maybe be kinda lagging.

Regards Jensenthomas1

[Snobby Hobo]

I can tell you fully convinced that this game will never get multiplayer. It has ragdoll physics en mass, way too many variables to consider and it's essentially a benchmarking software in terms of memory pressure.

Ragdoll physics have always been the bane of online games, and seeing how extensively they're being used here it's become almost an impossibility to implement.

[McSweeny]

Originally posted by Dinoman9877:

I don't think that this game would work well as multiplayer since you can change anything, make as many or as few units as you want, and change them to be completely OP.

"Oh I'm bringing 5000 footmen, what did you bring?"

"Ten Chuck Norrises."

"..."

Good joke!

[arrowsNL]

I mean that you can not change the people and gwn many soldiers at the same amount and the same type of soldier.
so the player that most people make death the opponent has more teammates than the other player

[Echorion]

Originally posted by Gaius Marius:

Originally posted by Awkward winkyface:

I can tell you fully convinced that this game will never get multiplayer. It has ragdoll physics en mass, way too many variables to consider and it's essentially a benchmarking software in terms of memory pressure.

Ragdoll physics have always been the bane of online games, and seeing how extensively they're being used here it's become almost an impossibility to implement.

Because no multiplayer game has ever utilized ragdoll physics, right? Ignorance is not bliss. There will always be consequences.

Sorta, it can be done but the guy is right in the sense they are EXTREMELY difficult to work with online. Ragdolls that happen randomly for each person though are not that hard.
It only turns near impossible when you try and sync ragdolls between players so that everyone in that online game sees the exact same thing.

[Rudolf Fischer]

Hot seat would be great. Amount of money for each player set. Black screened player 1 units, after he had placed them. Then start the battle! No network code needed.

[JHAC_Vader]

Originally posted by Dinoman:

I don't think that this game would work well as multiplayer since you can change anything, make as many or as few units as you want, and change them to be completely OP.

"Oh I'm bringing 5000 footmen, what did you bring?"

"Ten Chuck Norrises."

"..."

I mean thats probably for online with randoms but if you are playing with your friends you could just set rules