Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I looked her straight in the tits' and said "never".
I was right. (mostly).
The US measurement system has been defined by Metrics since 1893. That is to say, "one foot" is literally defined (not "translated") as 0.3048 meters. Saying you're six feet tall is a colloquialism of "I am 5.3 / 3rds of a meter tall", which just shows that we use 'clean' terms to hide 'messy' measurements. The movement in the 1970s by Jimmy Carter, et al. was an attempt to simply remove the colloquial euphemisms and use only 'clean' measurements.
Using a fractions-based, customary measurement system made sense when education was poor, access to measuring tools was rare, and imprecision in the final product enjoyed greater tolerance. It quickly loses favor when you're trying to do things like machine an orbiter that will then require minute maneuvers while circling another planet ~35 million miles (~57 million km) away.
Sources:
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/mars-climate-orbiter/in-depth/
https://www.nist.gov/pml/us-surveyfoot
Till then ?
Not so much.
Also you said that backwards. Metrics have been defined by Imperial (not US, Imperial).