GTX 960 owners - how's the game running?

[Yalden]

DOOM is a nightmare to run on this GPU, so I'm quite afraid to buy it, even if The New Order runs like a dream. So, how's it running for you guys?

[Jxe CZ [KLSCI]]

i Dont know, doom on my VEGA 960 OC run 60 without drops, 1080p medium/high with AA.

Wolfenstein run worst for me. I have medium/high settings 1080p. Game run 55-60 but sometimes drops to 40-45.

[bitterbird]

I have a 960 4GB and ran on a mixture of ultra/high settings with things mostly staying between 50-60, the only sections I've really noticed a drop were in the ruins section of manhattan and one other brief part.

[t850terminator]

GTX960 2GB, FX8320, 16GB RAM
I'm just under mininum specs (except RAM), but I've been running well at low (with some medium setting, and I turn off all post-processing since I'm stuck on that 2006 anti-postFX mentality)
60-50fps usual, goes to 70s (and sometimes 100s) inside the hub and drops to 40s at the lowest (first half of Manhattan)

Thing is, I running the game a bit TOO well, so fate is going to screw me somehow to balance out the luck.

[Mouad]

t850terminator eredeti hozzászólása:

GTX960 2GB, FX8320, 16GB RAM
I'm just under mininum specs (except RAM), but I've been running well at low (with some medium setting, and I turn off all post-processing since I'm stuck on that 2006 anti-postFX mentality)
60-50fps usual, goes to 70s (and sometimes 100s) inside the hub and drops to 40s at the lowest (first half of Manhattan)

Thing is, I running the game a bit TOO well, so fate is going to screw me somehow to balance out the luck.

can you please tell me your exact settings?

[↯Zindy⛦]

i own a intel 3770 with the gtx960 and it has no trouble running most anything, especially FPS's. Strategy games like Hoi4 late game with thousands of units will of course start to slow your game down but still lag is basically non-existent. I don't think you should be concerned with New collosus

[Jedron215]

Running fine on a 970, no major hiccups.

[Aerys]

GALAX GTX 960 2GB (Intel i7 3770, 8GB DDR3)
Running 1080p + Ultra profile

In the beggining, fps was ok but the resolution kind of got limited. I thought about buying a new card but it's so expensive here I just forgot the game.
Thankfully they fixed it with a huge update a week later and i could finally start this epic game.

Today, it's ok with 1920x1080 ultra, at least 90% of the game, i mean... there was one special scenario where the fps droped a lot, a very huge area with stuff happening quite fast.

Doom 2016 was ok for me, but i felt Wolfenstein 2 heavier and a bit broken.

I tried the top graphic settings (in 1080p), fps droped a lot, although I didn't see any visual improvement (imo). The game is pretty in any graphic settings.

To conclude, GTX 960 2gb is just "OK" for this game. But the game changes little in top graphical options.

[gast128]

I have here a i7-3770 with a 2GB GTX960 and the game has major perfomance issues. Settings all low. Some maps are ok; some maps (bunker section; Venus) have major stutter. Suprisingly the Venus map played well on the kill commander mission. Drivers are updated to latest version (391.35). I suppose the 2GB vram is too little.

[Cxjey2025]

The manhattan killed my hype after "train crashes". Mine is GTx 960 2gb, 8gb ram and amd fx6300

[Cal]

I'm also having major performance issues on the 2gb version. It was ok up until the manhattan level. Absolutely unplayable at that point even at 720p.

[Cardamon]

I have not got a chance to get stable 60 fps at the editing parameters ?
i5 3330 3GHz
ram 16 gb
gtx 960 2 gb

[thebaconson]

Doom is a nightmare? I was actually amazed at how well it ran on my 780(2GB)

The killer on wolf is the Video ram requirement, my 780 only had 2Gb and it ran pretty badly, there were lots of frame drops and not just drop, but the whole game was a slide show until you exited the game completely and then restarted.
Upgrading to a 1070Ti with 8GB video memory the game runs fine.

you dont need the fastest card but it needs a lot of memory, which is a problem I have heard of good performance on 970's with 4gb ram.

[trek554]

thebaconson eredeti hozzászólása:

Doom is a nightmare? I was actually amazed at how well it ran on my 780(2GB)

The killer on wolf is the Video ram requirement, my 780 only had 2Gb and it ran pretty badly, there were lots of frame drops and not just drop, but the whole game was a slide show until you exited the game completely and then restarted.
Upgrading to a 1070Ti with 8GB video memory the game runs fine.

you dont need the fastest card but it needs a lot of memory, which is a problem I have heard of good performance on 970's with 4gb ram.

why do you keep saying 780 2gb? there is no such thing.

[thebaconson]

trek554 eredeti hozzászólása:

thebaconson eredeti hozzászólása:

Doom is a nightmare? I was actually amazed at how well it ran on my 780(2GB)

The killer on wolf is the Video ram requirement, my 780 only had 2Gb and it ran pretty badly, there were lots of frame drops and not just drop, but the whole game was a slide show until you exited the game completely and then restarted.
Upgrading to a 1070Ti with 8GB video memory the game runs fine.

you dont need the fastest card but it needs a lot of memory, which is a problem I have heard of good performance on 970's with 4gb ram.

why do you keep saying 780 2gb? there is no such thing.

My bad, 3GB, well then 3gb aint enough for wolf2.
I was looking up a lot of card specs at the time and did get a bit confused, until recently total video ram hasnt been a big thing for me, so I haven't memorised them all.

[Mapwales]

Just downloading the demo going to try run on EVGA 950 SC+ 2gig running with boost clock settings at max will get back and report results

Ps can someone tell me if there's a setting to select vulkan or DX12 ? as i'm still watching it download it's half way there COMEON lol