Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Only importance is that I liked it, dont care about others.
In all honesty, 5/10 seems to me a bit too low.
I mean, a game can be full of stereotypes, and still be fun to play.
ACG is my reviewer.
Oh right, let me make a little correction...
Heh. Much better. :D
yeh thats true, but i will take the words of a big group of steam reviews anyday against these articles, everything is about money nowadays, we can only trust on someones negative but well constructed comment about the game, i mean, thats how i usually choose games and im dont regreat.
I choosed this game after reading some negative points about it but for me wasnt enough against the good point of the game, and till now i agreed with the negative point BUT im glad i bought it.
Fire? I think the reviewer is a freelance writer. I get the feeling that they piecemeal out their reviews based on some criteria that has little to do with suitability of the reviewer.
I miss the old days of PC gamer Magazine. The first thing I always read was the RPG column by Deslock (I believe was the name). You knew that when you read a review of an RPG game written by Deslock that you were getting the thoughts of a true RPG fan.
Nowadays, you usually have no idea who the heck is reviewing the game, what their background is, what their gaming preferences are, or whether they have an agenda they are trying to push.