Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Effeciency decreases response time, which decreases CPU, which reduces servers required which essentially reduces costs.
Improving quality increases the subscriber cap that a feature adds, allowing you to add more subscribers without adding additional features.
I would say Quality > Efficiency at this point. I added about 300 points of quality just on my landing page and my subscriber cap went from 200k to 9 million.
Happy you figured it out! Product functionality is very rough around the edges and quite hard to figure out in the beginning. I hope that I'll soon be able to put some time into improving the usability.
Regarding the massive amount of users from usability: This will be nerfed a lot in the future. Other features will be buffed instead.
Best,
Jonas
I'd rather see much more flexibility and a little easier grind up for quality & efficiency. Additional components have less of an impact on both performance and max user count, but make it easier to actually build robust components to add. That would be much more interesting.
It's a bit frustrating that money is basically no longer an issue, but I've maxed out my employee count and still make only very slow progress towards improving one single feature.
Thanks for your work - I think this is shaping up to be a great game!