安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Strengh : Can easily make good synchro and a big boss monster who can nuke the field.
Weakness : not enought defense , really weak against graveyard disruption (necrovalley , sealed tomb) , can brick (assault archdemon = death card in your hand) and if you don't open psychic , you pretty much can do nothing and can be easily disrupte before you dsucessfully summon a synchro.
I spent the 1000 gems for the deck ONLY to get another copy of Rose Warrior. Didn't plan to use the rest of the deck for anything.
But also it includes "Red Dragon Archfield", which is a "Signer Dragon", which gives it 3x damage in the Raid(s) vs. Immortal(s).
Still not using anything other than Rose Warrior and the Dragon, but dump the Rose Warrior (Level 4 turner) in an deck with other level 4's, and you can bring out the dragon for the extra damage in the Immortal event(s).
(And one copy of the Structured Deck will only cost you gems, unlike trying to make a "real version" of the deck, which would require you to play cash for 2 extra versions to merge together to make something PvP worthy.)
I've already spent about $96 on this game within a few months, but I don't think this deck is going to be what will push it over $100. Structured Decks are usually the best purchases for your money, there are better things to get than a second and/or third copy of this.
On the other hand, there are so many cards in the game, maybe someone else will spot some good one to spoof this this deck up. As a F2P deck though, it's pretty bad. If you /only have one Assault dragon and draw it, then you can summon it "from the deck." So you really do need 2 or 3 copies. I suspect several of the other structured decks work better than this one as a F2P.
How do you only have 1, also usually the event cards are in ranked UR tickets and I think event URs
I got 2 copies and spent the coins on the 3rd
It will, they usually do 2 of these unlockable events then release the characters, whatever the cards you see in this event are they will automatically be the next event and when you have him unlocked in gate
and maybe more popularly the "P2W" deck,) meaning what you can build out of 3 copies of the deck along other cards from that game.
The Structured decks all appear to be intended to be purchased in a set of 3, and then combined to make one or more variations of a complete deck out of the combination of the three.
Many people consider themselves F2P, and I think some of those people tend to contemplate the effectiveness of the cards in a Structured deck by thinking about what they can do with just one copy of it because the other copies are "Locked behind the Paywall."
What you can do with just one copy is "one subject", and is definetely of interest to many F2P players. What you can do with the combined decks is of interest to all serious players that might be concerned with opponents playing those decks, as well as the people who have, will, or might aquire all there (or possibly two) copies to be combined.
But my point is, that the discussion of the decks can be or remain more productive if people distinguish which "version" they're refering to. Of... and the "F2P" version is even a topic relavent even to less-than-high-tier P2W players, because it's something they're likely to face a lot in PvP.
Honestly, I have kept track of anyone being ambiguios here, but there have been some good serious discussions in-game that could really have benifited from the distinction. So I'm suggesting we try to follow some standard when discussing it.
If there already is some standard terminology to distinguish between the two F2P and combined ("P2W(?)") version, please let me know so we can go with that.
Thanks.
I haven't contemplated this deck too much (yet(?)) but I'm wondering if other people think that it might be more dependant on getting 2 or 3 copies than other decks.
BTW, I suspect Konami had determined that the Silent Magician deck was especially useful when using cards from the single copy, (especially just adding the "Silent Magician" and the "Silent Magicain Lv8" into other decks) which I suspect is why it's not possible to buy even one copy as a F2P player. (But you can use the very limited Dream Tickets to get the "Silent Magician" and get the LV8 out a box while staying F2P.)