Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I basically can't lean back with the xbox one controller or it goes out of range when I use it.
My current monitor is freesync 2, but I'm on an Nvidia card so maybe if new AMD GPUs ever reach a reasonable price I'll get one.
That's not what freesync and gsync do, they're intended to remove microstutter, not replace vsync by cutting tearing. Completely different purposes.
No, not all freesync monitors are Gsync compatible, though Nvidia is working to lower the restrictions on Gsync.
You're basing your understanding of variable refresh rates way too much off of marketing and not off of the actual technology.
Considering as well that my freesync 2 monitor isn't gsync compatible as per my GPU stating it, you're completely delusional.
Why in the ♥♥♥♥ would you use a monitor that lowers its refresh rate as an answer to a problem caused by your refresh rate being too low?
Rather, having a frame rate that's out of sync with your monitor's refresh rate theoretically will cause microstutter, so freesync and gsync attempt to remedy this by bringing refresh rate into sync with frame rate.
The one flaw with that system is that if you have say a 48-120hz refresh rate range, you'll still see the stutter under 48 fps.
The solution for this introduced by Gsync and later by Freesync2, is to keep monitor refresh rate exactly double your frame rate if frame rate falls under the range of refresh rates. So if you drop to 47 fps, the monitor's refresh rate will change to 94hz.
In theory it should appear smoother, but in practice it doesn't look noticeably different, which is why it's always given misleading marketing that ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like you keep parroting.
Meanwhile if your FPS still exceeds 120 on a 48-120hz freesync monitor, you'll still get screen tearing.
The slightest amount of critical thinking will gather what that means.
You're the only person I've been trying to convince of this because nobody else on the forum is this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid.
If you're going to keep falling for marketing scams, go ask Nvidia to bring SLI back and buy an optane drive while you're at it.
Skele on the other hand tried to explain to you how the whole thing works - well, he failed, as he apparently is not a trained professional for teaching small children.
You do realize that "Optane" is the name of a whole product-family, some of which are constantly in short supply because of high demands from the industry cause it really does perform that well?
Oh right - you are the person that gets all their supposed """knowledge""" from marketing - of course you do not know that.
https://www.pcmag.com/news/intel-discontinues-optane-only-ssds-for-consumers
What I'm saying about screen tearing isn't new and you have to be braindead to think that's the purpose of freesync and gsync.