Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So, looks like your timeline needs some work.
I would take any lore from FFXIV that ties into other games with an extremely large grain of salt, especially anything from the 24-man raids.
From how you phrased that, I am going to make the assumption that you have not played the Stormblood raids. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Not being combatitive with your statement, it just seems not something someone who has experienced that story content would say.
This is the first time any of the 24 man raid content has made a direct inference to another game, other than having a boss monster be a callback in looks, but not lore. Every other boss that was from a previous game had its own in-universe reason for being there not related to their origin games. Cloud of Darkness, The Warring Triad. Ultros/Chupon. They just shared looks/movesets. They were not the characters from their original games.
Sigmascape/Omegascape (the 8 mans) are "fiction brought to life" and have no bearing on the lore.
But the Ivalice raids are unambiguously canonical history of the the FFXIV world. The entire plot of them involves investigating history of the FF Tactics time period, and events that came later in the same timeline.
I'll look into Vagrant Story and insert it where it needs to be in the timeline.
UPDATE: So... unless I'm convinced otherwise, I'm not going to include Vagrant Story. This is due to the fact that Yasumi Matsuno claimed in 2004 that Vagrant Story was set in Ivalice. However, he later said in 2010 that Vagrant Story is completely independent of Ivalice (on top of the fact that the original game didn't have any connections anyway.) Unfortunately, I could only find one source for the 2010 statement (Fandom... so it's not that credible) and it did not give a direct quote. So if I'm convinced otherwise, I will be more than happy to include it.
I'll be honest, I don't know much about FFXIV. But if everything else is non-canon, why would only one of the raids be canon? Please correct me if I'm wrong since I haven't played any of it and I'll be more than happy to adjust my timeline if need be.
Thanks for the open minded reply. I'll do my best to explain the difference.
The other references were just that, references. Here's this ancient evil, and it looks like Cloud of Darkness, but has nothing to do with OG Cloud of Darkness, but is a nice fan-wank to see Cloud of Darkness in 3D, with all the pretty special effects and updated for the modern era, but it is not canonically your daddy's Cloud of Darkness, just a tribute.
The Ivalice raids have an entire storyline focusing on the hunt for the true history of Ivalice, and is driven by a family directly tied to the events of The War of the Lions, and as the storyline goes on they uncover more information about Delita, the Lucavi, Ramza, Alma, etc. By the second raid they pretty much start to theorize that the main "big bad empire" in FFXIV may be descendants of people who fled Goug in ages past due to shared biological traits (like incapable of using magic).
It's all about the context. The other times it was a throwaway, or using a cool design. With the Ivalice raids, it's deliberately integrated into the story, history, and world of FFXIV. With all the actual plot, story and history links the raids established with their plot, to throw FFXIV entirely outside the timeline would be at the same level as tossing out XII, A/A2 or Vagrant Story. The arguments in favor and against their inclusion can be used with XIV on the same level.
Some bits of the music, the artstyle (characters' skin), the palettes, the architectural beauty of the streets and undergrounds, the ranges and traps, although less meticulous as VS...
Saw this yesterday, the old man in Old Archades sitting with the kids (Fermon, I think) says something along the lines "...show respect for faeries tales", which is a Sydney's line from the intro. Someone clearly wanted to reference VS, I get references are just that, but Ivalice appears to be huge and VS, because of the magic and dark arts being taboo, appears to be set in the past, or some distant future, so there shouldn't be any harm.
I take great enjoyment in the lore of the world, especially the detailed localization work done to enhance the experience beyond a typical lazy translation. It reads a bit like high school drama class stuff but it works really well for the world and lore they were going towards.
Thank you for the clarification. I'll be sure to look into it and fit it where it should be. Unfortunately, I don't have access to my PC at the moment and am typing this from a terrible mobile browser. However, I will update it as soon as possible.
If you don't mind, could you explain this alternate timeline a bit more? I just want to know what I'm getting into before I try to find out where/how place the FFXIV raids.
It is Highly Noted that, that Ivalice in TA was created by Mewt. The Gran Grimoire has the ability not to create a rift in Time like the Grimoire of Rifts, but actually Manipulate the world around it by the holder (as stated in A2). That said, Mewt desires Created a Pseudo World using the history that the Book has Accumilated as well as FInal Fantasy 12
You can think of it like Final Fantasy 10, The Zanarkand that Tidus and Jecht is from is actually a Fake world from Memories created by the Fayth, where people like Yunalesca and Tidus' real counterpart Shuyin are from. So the Montblanc of Clan Nutty is not the same Montblanc of Clan Centurion.
I already noted why I believe that this fact has been retconned and was just due to it being the second game in the series. There are too many contradictions at this point to say that Ivalice in TA is an illusion. And if the Gran Grimoire did send them back in time and Mewt still has it, it stands to reason that the Gran Grinoire and the Grimoire of the Rift are one and the same. If you want more details, re-read my TA paragraphs in the main part of this discussion.
As for TA, being before FF12, I have also noted Montblanc being in Clan Nutty and then moving to Clan Centurion for all other entires in the timeline.
Few things. First, it's Nutsy (at least in the English version), note the S. Second, Montblanc was just a member of it (doesn't even suggest that he's a cofounder or anything, basically just that they're a bunch of guys what hang out with each other. So it stands to reason that any Clan that he was a Founder or Leader for would come after this (As you suggested, it's quite possible that Centurian grew out of Nutsy after Marche left). Third, Moogle Aging, you're basing a lot of the timeline on your PERCEIVED "lack of aging" of a race that doesn't seem to show any kind of aging. They all look the same age, regardless.
This video should explain things: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-JjYi60jko