Hunt: Showdown in 16K video resolution | 15360x8640 pixels | 16K gameplay | 16K gaming | 16K

[15360x8640.COM]

Hi guys, I think that this 16K video resolution gameplay of Hunt Showdown is very cool. 15360x8640 pixels or 132.7 megapixels rendered in real-time in Hunt: Showdown PC game.
#16K, #16Kresolution, #16Kgameplay, #16Kgaming,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBi94HnXh-s

[Socipat]

Here is a fun fact.

Unless you have perfect 20/20 vision (or better) you can't see 16K. Depending on how bad your vision is the most you'll see is 4K.

Now what I find really entertaining is your show 16K on a system that only allows up to 8K resolution.

[15360x8640.COM]

Originally posted by Socipat:

Here is a fun fact.

Unless you have perfect 20/20 vision (or better) you can't see 16K. Depending on how bad your vision is the most you'll see is 4K.

I strongly disagree with that statement. However people without the intelligence was saying the same to me about 4K in 2012 and 8K in 2015. Right now people are saying same nonsense about 16K video resolution and those people will end up nowhere on this planet because they are repeaters of somebody nonsense and the reason why those people repeat this misinformation - it made them to feel good. 16K video resolution even as DSR on 8K native screen looks like day and night when compared 8K native vs 8K native + 16K DSR.
Anyways, enjoy and use mathematics and physics if you want to be successful on this planet. Nonsense that you stated about 20/20 vision is like praying on tree, so the rain should stop!

[Socipat]

Originally posted by 15360x8640dotCOM:

Originally posted by Socipat:

Here is a fun fact.

Unless you have perfect 20/20 vision (or better) you can't see 16K. Depending on how bad your vision is the most you'll see is 4K.

I strongly disagree with that statement. However people without the intelligence was saying the same to me about 4K in 2012 and 8K in 2015. Right now people are saying same nonsense about 16K video resolution and those people will end up nowhere on this planet because they are repeaters of somebody nonsense and the reason why those people repeat this misinformation - it made them to feel good. 16K video resolution even as DSR on 8K native screen looks like day and night when compared 8K native vs 8K native + 16K DSR.
Anyways, enjoy and use mathematics and physics if you want to be successful on this planet. Nonsense that you stated about 20/20 vision is like praying on tree, so the rain should stop!

I can't see the difference. Than again with my glasses on I can only see up to 4K.

People with perfect vision can see a ridiculous high resolution. However, once you have corrected vision the resolution you can see drops like a brick. This is exasperated by the simple fact that the longer you wear glasses or contact lenses the worst your vision gets. Not to mention the older you get the worst you vision gets.

So, hate to be the fly in your tea but for people like me there was no difference between your 16K video and my 4K game.

In fact you the video looks off. Why do the hands and rifle look to be in a lower resolution than everything else? It look like they grabbed the greener mod from Fallout4 Nexus and installed it in Hunt.

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by Socipat:

Unless you have perfect 20/20 vision (or better) you can't see 16K.

Like you can't see above 60 fps?

[Socipat]

Originally posted by Mortilla:

Originally posted by Socipat:

Unless you have perfect 20/20 vision (or better) you can't see 16K.

Like you can't see above 60 fps?

Actually, according to many experts the human eye can only see between 30 to 60 FPS but this is disputed as some experts say that we can see up to 240 but no real definitive proof exist of this. So to your remark I will just say that I'm not the only one.

Now if you are making a joke about mental capacity than I would have to say that you must be suffering from dysnc.

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by Socipat:

Actually, according to many experts the human eye can only see between 30 to 60 FPS but this is disputed as some experts say that we can see up to 240 but no real definitive proof exist of this. So to your remark I will just say that I'm not the only one.

You're the only one.

Trust me on this.

Originally posted by Socipat:

Now if you are making a joke about mental capacity than I would have to say that you must be suffering from dysnc.

What? No, I'm making a joke about your wallet.

Go to work, get good hardware and enjoy.

[Socipat]

Originally posted by Mortilla:

Originally posted by Socipat:

Actually, according to many experts the human eye can only see between 30 to 60 FPS but this is disputed as some experts say that we can see up to 240 but no real definitive proof exist of this. So to your remark I will just say that I'm not the only one.

You're the only one.
Trust me on this.

Originally posted by Socipat:

Now if you are making a joke about mental capacity than I would have to say that you must be suffering from dysnc.

What? No, I'm making a joke about your wallet.
Go to work, get good hardware and enjoy.

Here is the health line article about how much a human eye can see.
https://www.healthline.com/health/human-eye-fps

Nividia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Driver Version 516.59
Intel I9-9900K CPU @ 3.60 GHz
16 GB Ram DDR 5
AT&T 1000 with 975 Mbps download speed during peek time

Its a little old but I don't think the issue is my rig.

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by Socipat:

Here is the health line article about how much a human eye can see.
https://www.healthline.com/health/human-eye-fps

Fine.

It basically repeats what you've been saying

Here is a youtube video about what pros prefer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcRwd_V0eds

Keep in mind that they're comparing 144hz to 240hz - which kind of ruins the whole " human eyes can only see 30 to 60 fps", right? I can personally attest to this.

Originally posted by Socipat:

Nividia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Driver Version 516.59
Intel I9-9900K CPU @ 3.60 GHz
16 GB Ram DDR 5
AT&T 1000 with 975 Mbps download speed during peek time

Please, use a high refresh-rate monitor. You won't regret it!

[Socipat]

Originally posted by Mortilla:

Originally posted by Socipat:

Here is the health line article about how much a human eye can see.
https://www.healthline.com/health/human-eye-fps

Fine.

It basically repeats what you've been saying

Here is a youtube video about what pros prefer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcRwd_V0eds

Keep in mind that they're comparing 144hz to 240hz - which kind of ruins the whole " human eyes can only see 30 to 60 fps", right? I can personally attest to this.

Originally posted by Socipat:

Nividia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Driver Version 516.59
Intel I9-9900K CPU @ 3.60 GHz
16 GB Ram DDR 5
AT&T 1000 with 975 Mbps download speed during peek time

Please, use a high refresh-rate monitor. You won't regret it!

Now your just reaching.
First you tell me that I'm stupid and don't know what I'm talking about and on top of that I'm poor.
I drop the receipt and show you may rig. Ooop, Maybe I do know a little bit of what I'm talking about and that is not a poor mans rig.
Now you tell me to get a better monitor.
I use a 55" 4K Samsung with a 60Hz refresh rate because the 50" 8K TV with the 120Hz refresh rate would have been a waist of money because 4K and 8K look the same to me.

Now let me make this clear. I don't like you, I don't value your opinion, and I don't want your advise. And I will not accept any apology from you. Now Good Day.

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by Socipat:

Now your just reaching.

Oh, not at all!

Originally posted by Socipat:

First you tell me that I'm stupid and don't know what I'm talking about and on top of that I'm poor.

Yes.

For all intents and purposes, I'll backtrack on the latter and stick with the former. The problem still remains: you're full of ♥♥♥♥.

Originally posted by Socipat:

I drop the receipt and show you may rig. Ooop, Maybe I do know a little bit of what I'm talking about and that is not a poor mans rig.

I mean, yes, you prove that money has been spent on hardware. That is very true and I will concede to this point.

However, and this is important: you're not making good use of it if "30 to 60 fps" is your approach to gaming. Something is up - get it fixed.

Originally posted by Socipat:

Now you tell me to get a better monitor.

Yes.

Originally posted by Socipat:

I use a 55" 4K Samsung with a 60Hz refresh rate because the 50" 8K TV with the 120Hz refresh rate would have been a waist of money because 4K and 8K look the same to me.

You've conflated two different things here.

Pixels and frames.

I don't know if you do this deliberately or not, but you obviously don't know what you're talking about. I just showed you what pros prefer. Why? Because frames matter -- and so does pixels.

You have a lot to learn.

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by Socipat:

Now your just reaching.
First you tell me that I'm stupid and don't know what I'm talking about and on top of that I'm poor.
I drop the receipt and show you may rig. Ooop, Maybe I do know a little bit of what I'm talking about and that is not a poor mans rig.
Now you tell me to get a better monitor.
I use a 55" 4K Samsung with a 60Hz refresh rate because the 50" 8K TV with the 120Hz refresh rate would have been a waist of money because 4K and 8K look the same to me.

Now let me make this clear. I don't like you, I don't value your opinion, and I don't want your advise. And I will not accept any apology from you. Now Good Day.

Also: are you lowkey expecting an apology? Really, mate?

You're talking nonsense.

What's wrong with you?

[15360x8640.COM]

Guys, please keep in mind that 2x Titan RTX SLI with 97-99% of GPU usage during the game render is faster than RTX 3090 Ti video card.

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by 15360x8640dotCOM:

Guys, please keep in mind that 2x Titan RTX SLI with 97-99% of GPU usage during the game render is faster than RTX 3090 Ti video card.

Sorry if we hijacked your thread.

Awesome video, btw!

Hunt: Showdown in 16k is legit.

[15360x8640.COM]

Originally posted by Mortilla:

Also: are you lowkey expecting an apology? Really, mate?

You're talking nonsense.

What's wrong with you?

My answer was not for Mortilla but for the guy that started nonsense that eye cant see 16K resolution - this guy from the group of idiots in 2012 that were saying to me that my eye cant see 4K resolution in 2012 while I was enjoying it at above 60 fps on my 4x Radeon R9 290 crossfireX video cards.
I was not address it for you but my reply was for Socipat:

[Mortilla]

Originally posted by 15360x8640dotCOM:

I was not address it for you but my reply was for Socipat:

Apologies.

My response was not to you, but for our mutual friend.

I've edited the post in question with proper quotations.