Hunt: Showdown 1896

Hunt: Showdown 1896

What resolution do you feel Hunt is best played on?
I have tried every resolution on the list in the graphics options. Which has a lot of them. Some give me crazy high fps, but lousy viewing. I keep going back to 1080.
I love the way it looks at 1440
( my native on Predator Monitor)
but I find 1080 the best to see.
How about you..what's your best?
🤠
< >
Showing 1-15 of 18 comments
Briosh Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:28am 
Ultrawide 2560x1080 !
Last edited by Briosh; Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:28am
Mr. Old Timer 58 Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:41am 
Originally posted by Briosh:
Ultrawide 2560x1080 !
Yes, that's super wide. I have the Acer Predator 32" Z1 curved gaming monitor.
I find the character (s) too small though in the 2560x1440. Maybe it's my eyes.
I find myself always going back to 1920x1080. It bothers me some because of the type of monitor I own. 😔
🤠
Last edited by Mr. Old Timer 58; Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:43am
Mr. Old Timer 58 Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:45am 
Wow. I just tried a custom resolution with my monitor. It passed the test with a 2560x1080 @ 165 Hz!
I will try this in the game!
🍻🤠
Last edited by Mr. Old Timer 58; Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:47am
Porsha Crystal Oct 9, 2020 @ 7:19am 
im playing 1280x768 cos its only relosution i can get almost stable 60 fps lol.
Brohei Flowtani Oct 9, 2020 @ 7:30am 
I want to play 1440p but it dips just below 60 too often for my liking, so I'm playing 1080p 90ish fps average for now. I'd have a 3080 by now if it were possible to find one T_T
ThreeDee Oct 9, 2020 @ 7:34am 
virtual 2k on my 24" 1080p monitor
Mr. Old Timer 58 Oct 9, 2020 @ 8:19am 
Originally posted by ThreeDee:
virtual 2k on my 24" 1080p monitor
😁🤠
Mr. Old Timer 58 Oct 9, 2020 @ 8:21am 
Originally posted by ThreeDee:
virtual 2k on my 24" 1080p monitor
I am using now that custom res. - 2560*1080. Wow! This is nice👍🏻
Didn't know my monitor could do this.
🤠
Mecharion Oct 9, 2020 @ 8:34am 
800x600

Looks like the old Duke nukem
Paft Oct 9, 2020 @ 5:32pm 
Personally the higher the better given how bad the aliasing is. Ideally 4k. But that's unplayable. I'm surprised people can make stuff out. Jaggy block fest. I start classing below high 70s unplayable for FPS. That's why I stick to my native 1920 x 1080. Looks like turd but i'm so used to high FPS with older games. I need the highest possible or it feels too sluggish, unless I solely play Hunt and get used to low FPS.
Last edited by Paft; Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:03pm
Unknown Oct 9, 2020 @ 5:36pm 
I've been playing 1440 for the longest time, had 50-65 fps, which I was "ok" with. But recently swapped to 1080 scaled, and while it doesnt look as nice, my graphics card is no longer at 100% constantly, and I'm always at my self-set fps limit of 75. Which is probably for the better lol
Shakaron Oct 10, 2020 @ 3:48am 
The best quality should be on the native resolution of your display.
The best performance should be on the lowest the possible resolution.
Mr. Old Timer 58 Oct 10, 2020 @ 6:13am 
Originally posted by Shakaron:
The best quality should be on the native resolution of your display.
The best performance should be on the lowest the possible resolution.
I have to say, I now use a
2560x1080 @165Hz resolution.
I play with all settings in the game at med settings with this res. I'm getting from 90-125 fps depending on location and actions ( battles, AI mobs, etc.)
On low settings it goes up 5-10 more fps and game looks funny so not worth the extra fps.
On all high settings I get 60-75 fps which is ok and the game looks fantastic but I do see a difference with the med settings ( fps) so I'm leaving it at those settings.
🤠
Shakaron Oct 12, 2020 @ 5:29am 
Originally posted by Old Timer 58:
Originally posted by Shakaron:
The best quality should be on the native resolution of your display.
The best performance should be on the lowest the possible resolution.
I have to say, I now use a
2560x1080 @165Hz resolution.
I play with all settings in the game at med settings with this res. I'm getting from 90-125 fps depending on location and actions ( battles, AI mobs, etc.)
On low settings it goes up 5-10 more fps and game looks funny so not worth the extra fps.
On all high settings I get 60-75 fps which is ok and the game looks fantastic but I do see a difference with the med settings ( fps) so I'm leaving it at those settings.
🤠
I run things mixed. I put things on High that affect draw distance, so I can spot hunters farther away. The rest is on low/medium. :) Draw distance is affected by object details (if I recall it correctly). You can experiment with it a bit and fine-tune it to best suit your hunting experience.
Last edited by Shakaron; Oct 12, 2020 @ 5:30am
Mr. Old Timer 58 Oct 12, 2020 @ 6:21am 
Originally posted by Shakaron:
Originally posted by Old Timer 58:
I have to say, I now use a
2560x1080 @165Hz resolution.
I play with all settings in the game at med settings with this res. I'm getting from 90-125 fps depending on location and actions ( battles, AI mobs, etc.)
On low settings it goes up 5-10 more fps and game looks funny so not worth the extra fps.
On all high settings I get 60-75 fps which is ok and the game looks fantastic but I do see a difference with the med settings ( fps) so I'm leaving it at those settings.
🤠
I run things mixed. I put things on High that affect draw distance, so I can spot hunters farther away. The rest is on low/medium. :) Draw distance is affected by object details (if I recall it correctly). You can experiment with it a bit and fine-tune it to best suit your hunting experience.
I have been doing so since my last post.
I am not in front of my pc, but I believe I have "object" on high,
Lightning on med and rest on low. The game is running really great, looks wonderful too.
The "ultra wide" resolution has greatly improved my game.
🤠🍻
< >
Showing 1-15 of 18 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Oct 9, 2020 @ 6:15am
Posts: 18