Anyone with stable 144 fps?

[all in]

I dont. Only 90-100 fps, low settings, ryzen 2600.

UPD. You can get 144 fps in 800x600 resolution, but with fps drops sometimes. With this resolution game still playable. Probably stable 144 fps will be with high top CPU. Something better then 2600 or even 3600 ryzens.

[Nino Poutso]

Die Hard. lähetti viestin:

snickii ⭐ lähetti viestin:

120-140 FPS with Titan RTX and i9 9900k, med-high settings

really? its a joke or even i9 9900k cant run this game in stable 144 fps without fps drops?

i dont have stable 144 lol

[all in]

El Diabolo lähetti viestin:

Stable 210-260 FPS, so yeah, ya'll need to get better rigs ...

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2006476272

Ryzen 3700X
Vega 56

1280x720
everything as low as possible, resolution scale at 50.

The GPU is actually running at comfortable 10 Watts, saves lots of energy.

Same resolution but everything on max i actually still get 170 FPS.

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2006476421

I just noticed one weird spot, when leaving Davant Ranch across the bridge towards Crematorium the FPS drop quite a lot (from 220 to 190 / from 170 to 150)

You should test in multiplayer game modes, here a big different in fps between game with players and without. If you will, I'll be grateful

[Mr. Old Timer 58]

I have a question. Can anyone really see a difference with fps @144+ from let's say mine which average about 75. Sometimes it dips and sometimes it rises but on med-high mix I get pretty much steady 75 during daylight maps. Night and fog are higher.
I had thought anything over 60fps you can't tell the difference. I ask because everyone is obsessed with fps.
I have an i7 975e cpu(old, I know) and a 1080ftw gpu.
Am I missing out on something?
Thanks for being patient with an older player🍻
🤠

[Nino Poutso]

dcd1958 lähetti viestin:

I have a question. Can anyone really see a difference with fps @144+ from let's say mine which average about 75. Sometimes it dips and sometimes it rises but on med-high mix I get pretty much steady 75 during daylight maps. Night and fog are higher.
I had thought anything over 60fps you can't tell the difference. I ask because everyone is obsessed with fps.
I have an i7 975e cpu(old, I know) and a 1080ftw gpu.
Am I missing out on something?
Thanks for being patient with an older player🍻
🤠 [/quoo

dcd1958 lähetti viestin:

I have a question. Can anyone really see a difference with fps @144+ from let's say mine which average about 75. Sometimes it dips and sometimes it rises but on med-high mix I get pretty much steady 75 during daylight maps. Night and fog are higher.
I had thought anything over 60fps you can't tell the difference. I ask because everyone is obsessed with fps.
I have an i7 975e cpu(old, I know) and a 1080ftw gpu.
Am I missing out on something?
Thanks for being patient with an older player🍻
🤠

once you go 144 hz you never go back

[Longshlong Jones]

El Diabolo lähetti viestin:

Stable 210-260 FPS, so yeah, ya'll need to get better rigs ...

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2006476272

Ryzen 3700X
Vega 56

1280x720
everything as low as possible, resolution scale at 50.

The GPU is actually running at comfortable 10 Watts, saves lots of energy.

Same resolution but everything on max i actually still get 170 FPS.

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2006476421

I just noticed one weird spot, when leaving Davant Ranch across the bridge towards Crematorium the FPS drop quite a lot (from 220 to 190 / from 170 to 150)

Get better rigs? You're playing at 50% resolution scale AND 1280x720, i dont think any low-mid range system would have issues running well at those settings. im not trashing anyone here, you do you but id assume most people would play at 100% scale and 1080p or 1440p
i7 8700k @4.5ghz, rtx 2080ti, 16gb 2133mhz, 1080p with everything on low besides anti aliasing on max 144 fps with dips to 60 in certain compounds/situations. overall 100-144 fps with average 130fps id say. i could have poor performance due to low ram speed, seen that it does have a slight impact on performance, will see after i replace these sticks.

[DarkKrieg]

Stable 144 on 1900x1600 with 9700k and 2070 super

[Buntkreuz]

DЕRMОDЕMОN lähetti viestin:

lol. this game is still in alpha. you should have 24 core cpu to run this game with stable fps

honestly the game has a bigger problem with GPU and RAM.
Crytek is just not getting any good performance out of their own engine, which is laughable especially considering the graphical quality being so poor for the small maps you play on.
I play on Highest settings, WQHD and get like 100fps with drops to 80.
Pretty bad considering my setup and the mentioned low graphical quality and mapsize.

[Mr. Old Timer 58]

Nino Poutso lähetti viestin:

dcd1958 lähetti viestin:

I have a question. Can anyone really see a difference with fps @144+ from let's say mine which average about 75. Sometimes it dips and sometimes it rises but on med-high mix I get pretty much steady 75 during daylight maps. Night and fog are higher.
I had thought anything over 60fps you can't tell the difference. I ask because everyone is obsessed with fps.
I have an i7 975e cpu(old, I know) and a 1080ftw gpu.
Am I missing out on something?
Thanks for being patient with an older player🍻
🤠 [/quoo

once you go 144 hz you never go back

We are not talking hz. My monitor does that.
We are talking about frames per second (fps)
🤠

[Tanyon]

Die Hard. lähetti viestin:

El Diabolo lähetti viestin:

Stable 210-260 FPS, so yeah, ya'll need to get better rigs ...

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2006476272

Ryzen 3700X
Vega 56

1280x720
everything as low as possible, resolution scale at 50.

The GPU is actually running at comfortable 10 Watts, saves lots of energy.

Same resolution but everything on max i actually still get 170 FPS.

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2006476421

I just noticed one weird spot, when leaving Davant Ranch across the bridge towards Crematorium the FPS drop quite a lot (from 220 to 190 / from 170 to 150)

You should test in multiplayer game modes, here a big different in fps between game with players and without. If you will, I'll be grateful :conwayheadscratch:

LMAO 1280x720 at 50% ratio.. no thanks I'll keep my 100% and my 1440x3400 BEAUTIFUL UW setup and my 75 FPS.. "get better rigs" why so I can turn the game down to nothing so it looks like I'm playing Chrono Trigger from 25 years ago.. ?

[DarkKrieg]

Darth lähetti viestin:

Die Hard. lähetti viestin:

You should test in multiplayer game modes, here a big different in fps between game with players and without. If you will, I'll be grateful :conwayheadscratch:

LMAO 1280x720 at 50% ratio.. no thanks I'll keep my 100% and my 1440x3400 BEAUTIFUL UW setup and my 75 FPS.. "get better rigs" why so I can turn the game down to nothing so it looks like I'm playing Chrono Trigger from 25 years ago.. ?

Yeah that's kinda weird. Why pay all that money for a good rig and play on the worst possible settings.

I got a new rig back in October and went from 40-50 FPS at 70% resolution everything on low, to a magical 140-160 FPS everything on High.

Made a MASSIVE difference in gameplay as well.

[Mr. Old Timer 58]

DarkKrieg lähetti viestin:

Darth lähetti viestin:

LMAO 1280x720 at 50% ratio.. no thanks I'll keep my 100% and my 1440x3400 BEAUTIFUL UW setup and my 75 FPS.. "get better rigs" why so I can turn the game down to nothing so it looks like I'm playing Chrono Trigger from 25 years ago.. ?

Yeah that's kinda weird. Why pay all that money for a good rig and play on the worst possible settings.

I got a new rig back in October and went from 40-50 FPS at 70% resolution everything on low, to a magical 140-160 FPS everything on High.

Made a MASSIVE difference in gameplay as well.

DarkKrieg,
What did you do? I mean what cpu did you go with?
🤠

[ElDiabolo]

Longshlong Jones lähetti viestin:

Get better rigs? You're playing at 50% resolution scale AND 1280x720, i dont think any low-mid range system would have issues running well at those settings. im not trashing anyone here, you do you but id assume most people would play at 100% scale and 1080p or 1440p
i7 8700k @4.5ghz, rtx 2080ti, 16gb 2133mhz, 1080p with everything on low besides anti aliasing on max 144 fps with dips to 60 in certain compounds/situations. overall 100-144 fps with average 130fps id say. i could have poor performance due to low ram speed, seen that it does have a slight impact on performance, will see after i replace these sticks.

Darth lähetti viestin:

LMAO 1280x720 at 50% ratio.. no thanks I'll keep my 100% and my 1440x3400 BEAUTIFUL UW setup and my 75 FPS.. "get better rigs" why so I can turn the game down to nothing so it looks like I'm playing Chrono Trigger from 25 years ago.. ?

Come on people, learn how to take a joke.

I obviously don’t play like that...

OP asked if anyone can run stable 144FPS and I said yes in one of the first posts.
I was mocking cause he didn’t specify the resolution which is the base for any performance or FPS discussion

[Longshlong Jones]

El Diabolo lähetti viestin:

Longshlong Jones lähetti viestin:

Get better rigs? You're playing at 50% resolution scale AND 1280x720, i dont think any low-mid range system would have issues running well at those settings. im not trashing anyone here, you do you but id assume most people would play at 100% scale and 1080p or 1440p
i7 8700k @4.5ghz, rtx 2080ti, 16gb 2133mhz, 1080p with everything on low besides anti aliasing on max 144 fps with dips to 60 in certain compounds/situations. overall 100-144 fps with average 130fps id say. i could have poor performance due to low ram speed, seen that it does have a slight impact on performance, will see after i replace these sticks.

Darth lähetti viestin:

LMAO 1280x720 at 50% ratio.. no thanks I'll keep my 100% and my 1440x3400 BEAUTIFUL UW setup and my 75 FPS.. "get better rigs" why so I can turn the game down to nothing so it looks like I'm playing Chrono Trigger from 25 years ago.. ?

Come on people, learn how to take a joke.

I obviously don’t play like that...

OP asked if anyone can run stable 144FPS and I said yes in one of the first posts.
I was mocking cause he didn’t specify the resolution which is the base for any performance or FPS discussion

damn i thought you were serious, on the other hand the 10 watts comment shouldve tipped me off

[Mr. Old Timer 58]

Did anyone play today? I am asking because all of a sudden I went from 70/75 fps to 100+ at times. I haven't done anything to my machine so I am just curious if other people experienced such a big difference in frame rate?
🤠

[all in]

dcd1958 lähetti viestin:

Did anyone play today? I am asking because all of a sudden I went from 70/75 fps to 100+ at times. I haven't done anything to my machine so I am just curious if other people experienced such a big difference in frame rate?
🤠

I am. But i was already in 800x600 resolution mode, for extra fps, so... cant be sure. Just locked 144 fps with fps drops sometimes. May be after update 1.2.1 it runs really better.