ryzen 5 2600x + gtx 1060 6gb

[Hartassen]

Anyone who has this setup and can tell me their fps in game and at what settings/resolution?

[his1roguenation]

Why start the game and play with settings for 1 minute if you can post a question on the board instead.

[ElDiabolo]

Cause you have to download for 2 hours (me at least) and deal with refund and everything ?

@OP I run a different setup (Vega 56 + r7 3700X) so I cannot tell you exact values. I run it at 60FPS capped 1440p, medium.

You should be able to run it at 60FPS on 1440p low I guess.

[Hartassen]

Originally posted by his1roguenation:

Why start the game and play with settings for 1 minute if you can post a question on the board instead.

Because
1) steam hates when you do this
2) I have a 1060 6gb but an OC i5-4670K and I'm thinking of getting a 2600X to deal with 1% lows in the high 40-s low 50's but I want to know what performance increase I'll get and if it's even worth it.

[ShoctorDie290]

Originally posted by Hartassen:

Originally posted by his1roguenation:

Why start the game and play with settings for 1 minute if you can post a question on the board instead.

Because
1) steam hates when you do this
2) I have a 1060 6gb but an OC i5-4670K and I'm thinking of getting a 2600X to deal with 1% lows in the high 40-s low 50's but I want to know what performance increase I'll get and if it's even worth it.

I also have a 4670k, mine is OC'd to 4.2 GHZ on all cores, I have 16 gigs ddr3 at 1666mhz and a 780ti 3 gig, I run on all medium at 1080p and I have zero issues. Hovering around the mid 70's in FPS, rarely, if ever, dip below 60. I notice no tearing whatsoever and it runs totally fine.

[Hartassen]

Originally posted by ShoctorDie290:

Originally posted by Hartassen:

Because
1) steam hates when you do this
2) I have a 1060 6gb but an OC i5-4670K and I'm thinking of getting a 2600X to deal with 1% lows in the high 40-s low 50's but I want to know what performance increase I'll get and if it's even worth it.

I also have a 4670k, mine is OC'd to 4.2 GHZ on all cores, I have 16 gigs ddr3 at 1666mhz and a 780ti 3 gig, I run on all medium at 1080p and I have zero issues. Hovering around the mid 70's in FPS, rarely, if ever, dip below 60. I notice no tearing whatsoever and it runs totally fine.

That's funny. I have 4670K at 4.1 16 gig ddr3 1600 mhz cl9, and the 1060 6gb of course, I can get up to 130 fps in some areas, but in other areas with fighting it can dip to 50. But of course it usually stays above 70, but average fps is not what defines the experience, it's the 1% lows, if you drop to 50 during a fight but have 70-110 otherwise that's still problematic.

[ShoctorDie290]

Originally posted by Hartassen:

Originally posted by ShoctorDie290:

I also have a 4670k, mine is OC'd to 4.2 GHZ on all cores, I have 16 gigs ddr3 at 1666mhz and a 780ti 3 gig, I run on all medium at 1080p and I have zero issues. Hovering around the mid 70's in FPS, rarely, if ever, dip below 60. I notice no tearing whatsoever and it runs totally fine.

That's funny. I have 4670K at 4.1 16 gig ddr3 1600 mhz cl9, and the 1060 6gb of course, I can get up to 130 fps in some areas, but in other areas with fighting it can dip to 50. But of course it usually stays above 70, but average fps is not what defines the experience, it's the 1% lows, if you drop to 50 during a fight but have 70-110 otherwise that's still problematic.

Sorry man, I never dip that low, try lowering some settings?

[Shakaron]

Originally posted by Hartassen:

Originally posted by his1roguenation:

Why start the game and play with settings for 1 minute if you can post a question on the board instead.

Because
1) steam hates when you do this
2) I have a 1060 6gb but an OC i5-4670K and I'm thinking of getting a 2600X to deal with 1% lows in the high 40-s low 50's but I want to know what performance increase I'll get and if it's even worth it.

The frame times in Hunt are highly variable. Your 1% low will not be helped much by a CPU upgrade, unfortunately. The game has detailed diagnostics which shows the average, min and max FPS and sometimes the max is multiple of the min. The average is rather fine though.

Future optimization passes will help the 1% low.

[Hartassen]

Originally posted by Shakaron:

The frame times in Hunt are highly variable. Your 1% low will not be helped much by a CPU upgrade, unfortunately. The game has detailed diagnostics which shows the average, min and max FPS and sometimes the max is multiple of the min. The average is rather fine though.

Future optimization passes will help the 1% low.

Are you sure about this? I noticed with rivatuner that my gpu is anywhere from 70-95% usage while my cpu is always above 90% and pushing 100% quite a lot. If I were to get ddr4 ram with a ryzen 5 3600 along with my 1060 6gb I'd definitely break the recommend specs, as it stands my ddr3 and i5-4670K don't really meet the recommended criterias.

[Shakaron]

Originally posted by Hartassen:

Originally posted by Shakaron:

The frame times in Hunt are highly variable. Your 1% low will not be helped much by a CPU upgrade, unfortunately. The game has detailed diagnostics which shows the average, min and max FPS and sometimes the max is multiple of the min. The average is rather fine though.

Future optimization passes will help the 1% low.

Are you sure about this? I noticed with rivatuner that my gpu is anywhere from 70-95% usage while my cpu is always above 90% and pushing 100% quite a lot. If I were to get ddr4 ram with a ryzen 5 3600 along with my 1060 6gb I'd definitely break the recommend specs, as it stands my ddr3 and i5-4670K don't really meet the recommended criterias.

I love the game and I play it whenever I can. It's fun. Don't get me wrong.

But I wanted to make things clear, that your average frame rates will be probably fine, but your 1% lows will still be rather low.

This is my game play with i5-7600K (@5.0 GHz) and GTX 1080 Ti and 16 GB DDR4. You can see that my average frame rates are around 100 FPS but the min drops to the 50's sometimes. (That would be close to the 1% lows). So the average is all right, but there are some frame rate drops here and there. I'm pretty sure you'll have that with any CPU.

[Hartassen]

Originally posted by Shakaron:

Originally posted by Hartassen:

Are you sure about this? I noticed with rivatuner that my gpu is anywhere from 70-95% usage while my cpu is always above 90% and pushing 100% quite a lot. If I were to get ddr4 ram with a ryzen 5 3600 along with my 1060 6gb I'd definitely break the recommend specs, as it stands my ddr3 and i5-4670K don't really meet the recommended criterias.

I love the game and I play it whenever I can. It's fun. Don't get me wrong.

But I wanted to make things clear, that your average frame rates will be probably fine, but your 1% lows will still be rather low.

This is my game play with i5-7600K (@5.0 GHz) and GTX 1080 Ti and 16 GB DDR4. You can see that my average frame rates are around 100 FPS but the min drops to the 50's sometimes. (That would be close to the 1% lows). So the average is all right, but there are some frame rate drops here and there. I'm pretty sure you'll have that with any CPU.

Couldn't that just be from both of us having 4 core 4 thread cpu's? From what I've heard this game likes extra threads and cores or is that incorrect?

At any rate I think I'll upgrade anyway simply because of bannerlord coming out in march (hopefully) and some other games I'd like to enjoy in the future.