Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I find wight king stacks to be quite effective, although they either need healing items or a necromancer or two. The main problem i have is how many units in the HE roster end up with fire based attacks making regen detrimental, i lost a level 40 ghoul king on a terrorgheist who had mainly combat buffs AND the sword of kaine utterly trashed in 1v1 by teclis on his bloody gay rainbow bird. Most of Vampires effective units have inherent regen making them ♥♥♥♥♥ against trash units like flamespire phoenix and sun dragons, tyrion also has flame based attacks, the only thing I can think of that would be any good is blood knights if you can avoid all the spears.
Well, single entity stacks are always much better with healing.
Also, why would you 1v1 anyone? With single entity stacks you always want to keep your units together.
And vampire effective units? It's only heroes and skelly spam XD... their roster is a real trash, i hope it will be different in immortal empires.
This tactic also works perfectly against Dark Elves too.
The fire dmg buff is only 25%, which barly outmatches the poison debuff in that matchup.
Besides that, i'd agree that HE aren't the easiest enemy to take down as vamps, fortunatly the Ai got little idea how to fight you well. If it was pvp, it would be another story.