Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
THat is realy vague, since a lot depends on situation on map overall, mods you used etc. It all comes down to units on field, economy and empires size.
I'd say for Vortex it's as above, for ME it's a higher threshold, most people would split the game up by the Chaos invasions so coming up on Turn 80 for early, then coming up to the second one around turn 140, then post is late game. Of course that's just my opinion.
Mortal Empires. I think I've done 5 or so campaigns already but I get what you guys are saying. The more I learned, the easier the game got for me. Right now it feels like mid game is past turn 50 and late game is past turn 150 but I was just curious what everyone else classified it as.
On my Yvresse campaign, I sorta backed myself into a corner by never agreeing to an alliance until it was too late. By then Karak, Reikland, and Bretonna controlled 50% of the map and I the other 50%. I wanted to see how the final showdown was gonna be and it was brutal lol. Plenty of maxed out hellrockets and stacks as far as the eyes could see which would make a Chaos invasion a joke. And to top it off, no lightning strike. But yeah thanks.
early is 0-3, mid is 3-4, late is 4-5
Ofcourse some lower tier units remain useful though
As some factions you can win without actually getting to the late game
So if you turled wiht dwarf into turn 200+ wiht tier 3 units, got assaulted from every corner by stacks of t5 rank 9 units, you still in midgame?
Sorry, what you say have no sense whatsoever. Sure, your decisions on campaign map dictated by units aviable to you and resources at hand, but limit separation of game stages by unit tier would only lead you to pretty dumb contradictions.
But you are also right, cause how map is haped after chaos invaion is pretyt much decided between turns 80-120. That is lategame as it is, major forces on map clash with each other and no longer drawn in local squabbles and you need ot find your place in it.
Phase of the game has little to do with the number on the turn indicator, and more to do with the state of your faction, and those that share your campaign.
I haven't put a definition on it, but I guess you could say that "early" game is the most fun; everyone is pretty much 1:1, you have a lot of choices for expansion, diplomatic options, and there are few factions that could wipe you out with no chance of you surviving. It's not easy yet because you haven't made any doomstacks and your generals have a good chance of dying if you aren't careful.
Midgame is when factions carve out home territories, are larger and have higher-tier buildings, and you'll start facing things like tier-4 armies. Likewise, your own forces should be able to hold their own as long as you manage your game. At least your best generals and heros are level 20 so that they don't die if you lose a battle, which is a huge boost. This is the second best phase, but a lot depends if the ai factions have created unbeatable alliances or if you have.
Endgame is when the results are sort-of telegraphed, but you could still screw up if you're not careful, or if you're an "evil" faction, the ordertide is going to be sending stacks and stacks and stacks of armies at you. At this point it turns into a slog...wars of attrition, lots of simular battles because your armies have reached their final setup, likewise the enemies are going to have lots of max-tier units. This can be a boring phase if you're not being challenged, and I usually stop playing at this point because the thrill that the early game provices is so much better, I'd rather start a new campaign.
(This is all with the obvious caveat that I'm speaking from the point of view of an average player, as opposed to those who play legendary for entertainment or exploit the map and AI.)
Pretty much agree with you, but mind you, that w/o mods, you clearly can diffirentiate stage by turns, as enemy on other side of map is not much affected by you until lategame, so their development have pretty predictable tempo, and you cant affect much of it for enemy on other side of map until lategame.
But that lead me to other thought... what if we consider "lategame" as phase, where you can manipulate enemy economy and wars for faction o father side of map from you?
Not sure if it is good differentiation, need to think about it more thoroughfully, but at least that is what allighned with my "feel" of game and explains that much difference in answers betwene players.
Mid game for the empire is late game for the beastmen, for example.
One of the enjoyments I get from the game is every time there was one of the larger patches or DLC that messed with the balance of power. Any time I see the Greenskins or Vampire Counts carve up the order factions, or Dark Elves overrun the Elf Donut, I get warm fuzzies.