Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Khatep's start is probably the hardest in the game, imo. Which is a shame because he's my favorite. Maybe Skarsnik has it worse? Arkhan's start is pretty rough too.
Raiding as tomb kings will give you much more money than economy building and it grants you relation buffs with enemies of raided faction, it's great early game.
For late game there is a cheese/exploit with one of the followers, unless it was patched.
And if you want as chill tomb kings experience as possible, play as settra.
Can't say about Khatep but Arkhan has the hardest starting position in the game and there is no good guide on him...
I recently tried a strat of building up a second army and then pushing north and let me tell you... it's terrible.
It's much better to push north early on and with the right unit placement you will get attacked by your starting enemy in scenario that is fairly easy to win then take their only city and aattack rasponse before they have any chance to confederate with the rest of brettonia... if they do, you are in deep trouble.
Another really important thing with tomb kings is: specialize your armies, and have any weaknesses covered by the second army.
In TWWH1, I noticed that you could gradually hire all the faction's LLs and do most of their LL-specific quests within one campaign -- if that's true here as well, then perhaps it's just a matter of power-leveling all the LLs again?
Once I beat a campaign with one faction, I'm unlikely to rotate back to it for quite some time (and High Elves are last just due to... those threads...).
Hahahahahaha, Dark Elves go brrr, there is no, srsly NO SINGLE MOD or campange in TWW 2 where at the end of the day i hadn't fought the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ DRUCHII as my last oppponent, i'm so angry at this point i'd like them to not exist in the game anymore. Also the Orcs are anoying aswell, i absolutely agree. It is simply redicoulus how unbalanced these two factions are. They dominate each game, so it's simply absolutely boring.
NERF DRUCHII, NERF ORCS
BUFF TOMB KINGS
PS: Sry for bad spelling, i'm not a native speaker and a little drunk xD
Yea, this! They have three types of magic I think and the only goodish one, the lore of shadows is only accessable after some quests. Lore of Death and Lore of Nekehara are two of the absolute weakest lores in the game imho.
They get lore of light too. Banishment is pretty good, but yeah Shadows is pretty nice.
I had a start with Khalida (IIRC) that gave me a knowledgeable Shadow Priest as my starting hero... I'm not sure if that's a bug or not but it was fantastic.
if a noob like me 300 hours of gameplay ago could do it, then I can only suspect it must be skill issue on your part
Orcs did get nerfed in wh3, now you won't get khurzak dominate south, grimgor dominate north and randomly they just confederate.
Also dark elves were nerfed in wh3, they have a different slave system.
And tomb kings did got buffed in wh3 as well...
you don't have to take the game "seriously" to be good at it, was my point. what does it even mean to take the game seriously?