Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
its called the fae enchantress and double paladin
can grind down a near infinite amount of infantry and be a menace to anything large as well
Of course it would seem like they suck if its from a Legends of Total War video. His only real gimmick is that he exploits the AI's stupidity while playing on the hardest of difficulties which alters the stats.
Ok but there's nothing else to shoot for in T4 or T5 in the shrine chain which would replace the unit, a reason to do this would be to strenghten the prospects of that building chain much further or CA just move the unit down. Bretonnia infantry game doesn't really go anywhere past T3, I wonder would an extra high tier support unit help scale abit better. question is how would that be packaged.
You have that backwards, it's 8 on foot, 5 on the mount.
And not counting her against the treemen (where the very_large splash target size is very beneficial to her), I'm talking about her just in the middle of a bunch of melee infantry. Each attack of her's should be hitting more targets in addition to doing more damage when on foot, at least against infantry. And she also has a faster attack speed on foot, though maybe her attack animations favor her on the cauldron here, haven't paid that much attention to that.
As for the thing with low MA, you're failing to recognize that one shotting units is not the only way to kill one. They don't instantly regenerate all their health if an attack doesn't kill them. Splitting damage across multiple units is not going to reduce the overall damage dealt.
WEll, ok, i got numbers backwards, but it actually only adds up to my point. She have high sucess rate with big splash. That way said damage is spread thin between units and so she can end up killing noone with this strike. And no, unless it is somewhat pefect half of unit health in damage if your strike is not killing unit - your next strike would be overkill. SO you lose tempo and lose it hard. Unless amount of units you strike AND damage is same to amount of units that can strike you. And if you not kill that unit and next strike would lose against enemy MD? He would be pushed off with half health. Still being able to strike you. It is 2 rounds for enemy to strike you (depends on attackspee, but they are in most cases around same, differences mostly counts in duels or reeeeealy long fight). While on mount she is virually guaranteed to kill 2 elite units with each strike. Or about 3-4 t1-t2 units.
P.S. And yes, splitting damage against multiple units can reduce overall damage dealt. THat is pretty common knowledge in any game with damage/health and multiple enemies/shots. THere is a term for it across all games. Break Point. SO unless you achieve next breakpoint there is no reason to increase damage while reducing some other stat. It would reduce your overall damage instead of increasing it. Any economist knows that too, they have even multiple terms for different types of reduced effectiveness while supply is increased. Most known one is "diminishing returns".
okay Nazi.
I really don't think you're thinking this through.
First off, just look at it in practice: what single-entity or low model count units are good at killing infantry, in your experience? Typically ones with a higher splash count and higher MA. If your reasoning were correct, units with the lowest splash attacks would be the most effective single entities at killing infantry. They're not.
Second, you're being incredibly simplistic in your reasoning. It's not just "breakpoints, therefore killing fewer units in one hit is better than killing a bunch in 2-3." Breakpoints mean that it can be more effective to hit fewer targets, not that hitting fewer targets is always good. It depends on the damage being dealt to the target and the health of the target. Yes, if, say, hitting 3 targets instead of 5 will allow you to one shot those 3 you'd be killing 5 in two hits, that is going to be more damage output. But the opposite can also happen: hitting more targets could keep breakpoints exactly the same, where it's going to take 2 hits to kill models if you hit 3 targets or if you hit 5 targets. And in that case, hitting 5 targets is going to be a much greater increase in damage output than in the former situation.
Third, the specific battles I'm thinking of where I used Hellebron on foot and on the cauldron were primarily against Dreadspears, the models of which are getting one shot by her on the cauldron when all 5 of her splash attacks hit. Lower melee attack is nothing but detrimental in that situation.
The leadership buff then makes it even harder to break them the regular way.
Look, it's important to recognize the limitations of Bretonnia so as to not be burdened by unreasonable expectations.
Classifying what are clearly human people as something sub-human or lesser is exactly what Adolf and his buddies would say to justify genocide or how White Europeans thought they were inherently superior to non whites or certain other European ethnicities.
You sound like some kind of Neo Nazi.