Total War mount n blade style make it happen ! 2020 sucks make 2021 fun again.

[The_Daleatron]

come on dev team make this happen give the world what we need give us an amazing total war warhammer style mount n blade banner lord style experiance and make millions of moniesm or blood for the blood god.

[ZZZZZ]

that doesnt even make sense, either you control one (m&b) or you control all (total war)..

[The_Daleatron]

Originally posted by The_Unknown_05:

that doesnt even make sense, either you control one (m&b) or you control all (total war)..

a warhammer looking mount n blade game what doesnt make sense

[dulany67]

Originally posted by The_Unknown_05:

that doesnt even make sense, either you control one (m&b) or you control all (total war)..

Not true. You control the armies as well as fighting personally in Bannerlord.

Th real issue is that a top notch rig can put about 1000 men on the field in M&B.

[chef]

Originally posted by The_Daleatron:

Originally posted by The_Unknown_05:

that doesnt even make sense, either you control one (m&b) or you control all (total war)..

a warhammer looking mount n blade game what doesnt make sense :deadweight:

The mods for bannerlord are going to be great. There already working on a warhammer one

[Brave and Fearless Sir Shiba]

theres a warhammer mod for mount and blade warband. aswell as LOTR too. and iirc there is a Warhammer mod already in the works for Bannerlord too altho its limited since (from what i hear anyway) they wont release proper mod tools till full release.

[ZZZZZ]

Originally posted by The_Daleatron:

Originally posted by The_Unknown_05:

that doesnt even make sense, either you control one (m&b) or you control all (total war)..

a warhammer looking mount n blade game what doesnt make sense :deadweight:

you said total war mount and blade and not just warhammer m&b thats the diff xD

[TheAlmightyProo]

Originally posted by dulany67:

Originally posted by The_Unknown_05:

that doesnt even make sense, either you control one (m&b) or you control all (total war)..

Not true. You control the armies as well as fighting personally in Bannerlord.

Th real issue is that a top notch rig can put about 1000 men on the field in M&B.

The realest issue re this thread is that control/cohesion etc of your army in M&B is minimal at best compared to TW games. It's pretty basic warfare a la peasant militia or bronze age... you get a mob blob of guys with a wide range of equipment and charge them in. No equipment and training/specialisation by unit like TW, and not much room for finesse.

Even trying hard to make such a system work (and a few games have tried over the years tbh with varying degrees of success but always with limitations) it's always going to be 75/25 army or player control at the very best and a tricky system/control scheme at that. It might be sort of workable but it'd end up being the TW war game that does the worst and for good reason.
M&B is good at what it does, but hasn't been alone in it's genre. TW is the best at what it does, and has no strong competition. Imo a hybrid of the two would be less than the sum of it's parts.

[ZZZZZ]

Originally posted by TheAlmightyProo:

Originally posted by dulany67:

Not true. You control the armies as well as fighting personally in Bannerlord.

Th real issue is that a top notch rig can put about 1000 men on the field in M&B.

The realest issue re this thread is that control/cohesion etc of your army in M&B is minimal at best compared to TW games. It's pretty basic warfare a la peasant militia or bronze age... you get a mob blob of guys with a wide range of equipment and charge them in. No equipment and training/specialisation by unit like TW, and not much room for finesse.

Even trying hard to make such a system work (and a few games have tried over the years tbh with varying degrees of success but always with limitations) it's always going to be 75/25 army or player control at the very best and a tricky system/control scheme at that. It might be sort of workable but it'd end up being the TW war game that does the worst and for good reason.
M&B is good at what it does, but hasn't been alone in it's genre. TW is the best at what it does, and has no strong competition. Imo a hybrid of the two would be less than the sum of it's parts.

king arthur was a good rpg rts.. but they killed it with the 2. game :/

[RED /(Weber)\]

Who makes it happen?

[Tricks]

Yeahh, again, hybrid games have never pulled off every facet of the game particularly well. You can have a good RTS, or a good RPG, if you try to do both it will not be as good at either one as a game that focuses solely on one or another.

And you want a hybrid of Total War, which in itself has seen massive amounts of work to improve it over the years and still has issues doing everything it sets out to do on the RTS side of things. Let alone adding a whole other facet to the game that now needs to be fleshed out.

No, let's just settle for a fully polished Total War Warhammer game with all the content by the end of the trilogy, shall we? Then see how things look at that point.

[glythe]

Originally posted by RED Floyd /(Weber)\:

Who makes it happen?

The modders at nexus world.

[ＳＨＡＤＯＷ２ＫＫ]

Mod tools are properly out for M8B Bannerlord 2 at end of this month, and Nexus modders are already working on WH based mods.

[Chillum]

Warsword conquest was pretty much one of the big 3 or 4 mods of M&B, only a matter of time really.

[Denveldon]

Originally posted by Awakened Shiba of the Inu:

theres a warhammer mod for mount and blade warband. aswell as LOTR too. and iirc there is a Warhammer mod already in the works for Bannerlord too altho its limited since (from what i hear anyway) they wont release proper mod tools till full release.

just a few days ago they presented the new modding tools in a video, they are comeing way, way earlier