Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
it wouldnt work that way.So they had to cut and stitch to make it happen
in the overall sense of the map they havnt cut that much -new world will stil be big BIG...
and despite what it looks like the overall map will be huuuuuuge
what we see dosnt give it justice..they removed alot of water mass(not needed anyway) which makes the map seems smaller
i dont want to spend 20 turns crossing an empty ocean anyway do you ?
we will have 117 factions running around 250 + settlements
year long end turn times and whatever else pops up
it will be EPIC !!!
Also i'm pretty sure, from what they said about having to keep the third game in mind while deciding how the map looks(you can actually see the area of the third game to the east of the World's Edge Mountains), that this is simply all the engine can handle. It's not just about end turn times and user's PCs, the engine is old at this point and has it's limitations just like any other engine.
It shouldn't be considered as a 'FreeLC' no matter if CA or anyone else says it is. This was a clear implementation, heavily promoted, to sell this trilogy of games. it was a major marketing and game implementation plan, and has nothing to do with 'Fanboys' at CA.
Consumers are absolutely right to be disappointed if the unified map is lacking, We didn't see CA saying last year at WH 1's release that "You know, we're kinda sorta going to reduce game 2's map size'. No, they didn't they promoted it as this major deal.
I can' t stand whiners as much as anybody,and troll them viciously, but come on peope, don't get mindless about this.
Those of us who've been supporting CA since pixelated Shogun 1 are well againted with their propensity to spout utter gobs hyte during prerelease, then back pedal or clam up on post release like the world's scuzziest lawyers.
It could be done. They still have to add in WH 3's map into it and that would be alot more than what a full map of WH 1-2 combined would be.
What should have been done IMO is make the map with all settlements in WH 1-2 in the grand campaign. Now when WH 3 comes out, they should shrink the map like they did in the mortal empire campaign and include all 3 game maps. The map would be massive at that point and can understand why they would have cut some settlements because it would include all 3 maps into one grand campaign. I would be massive in its self.
They could have easly fit both WH 1-2 maps into one, if not, then how are they going to include both WH: 1-2-3 maps into one?
Just ones opinion.
Come on, you know if they stuck a $20 price tag on it, you'd be burning them to the ground. Something along the lines of "I PAID $60 FOR THE FIRST GAME AND $60 FOR THE SECOND, AND NOW YOU WANT ME TO PAY ANOTHER $20 TO GET THE OTHER HALF OF THE SECOND??!! I'M DONE CA, AND I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE."
Something like that. I'm not pleased about them cutting any content either, but it is free content. The first game was complete. Spent loads of hours playing it. The second is complete as well, basically the first with different factions, but more strategy involved with the introduction of rites, rituals, and unique faction mechanics. I'd say that the second feels more complete than the first. While I'm super stoaked for ME, and will probably play that a majority of the time, the vortex campaign was satisfying.