Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
The upkeep one for saurus is a little pointless imo, and the armour really isn't that good.
10% HP is decent but the other benefits are kinda poor.
Similarly 10% replenishment is great but the other benefits are bad.
The WoM, Magic resist, and speed one is has the most useful traits for sure, but the values are kinda low.
But that's because I typically field infantry heavy armies because I find dino spam boring, so the other best alternative is probably the upkeep reduction to them if that's your plan.
-edit- my maths was wrong, with all his reductions it's actually 103% on saurus units.
I took it in my last campaign and it was the difference between like 100 and 60 upkeep or something like that. Not terribly substantial imo, since it only applies to the one army.
If you do it on all your armies (normal lords will get to 53% reduction) that means you can field 3 stacks before you start to feel the penalty from supply lines on VH/L.
Hmm...
Point is you can win about 95 percent of battles with a stack thats probably 1/4th the cost of a dino spam army. If you can afford several dino spam armies, the game is over and you're playing for flavour, at which point the best option is no longer an important question.