Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Dwarfs were responsible, easy enough. Can't take a little jest, have beards like filthy barbarians, live like rats in dark holes, the only book they ever read and wrote was their Big Book of Pettiness (probably more illustrations and pictograms than words in it^^), and overall they never apologized for sending an unshaven bearded emissary to the Phoenix Court, which was in itself an offense.
Then they murderd the Phoenix King, stole his crown like little halfling thieves, and still think they won a war that the High Elf simply stopped for the time being because of more pressing matters. Like, well, saving the world over and over again.
So yeah, the War of the BEARD, as it is actually called, is full on the Dwarfs, or Dwarves, of whatever they wanna be spelled like.
Yep, my favorite faction beside Empire is High Elves ... who would have guessed ^^
Well first I don't agree with anything you said
1. They were rightfully angry they had lost alot of well known dawi in these attacks and Aegir fireheart was one of them..and too the Dawi he was Basically an Ancient a piece of dawi history gone and possibly never got to pass on all of his knowledge that is a big freakin deal...
2.they do read books they are really smart and great tacticians tbh and Ironbreaker shield wall is nigh impenetrable dragon princes would have trouble breaking it..
3. The dammaz kron is their culture that is the Dawi way you do d something to slight them you have to pay..its the way it is I respect that
4. Caeldor shaved the Dawi that were sent because he knew how offensive it was to their culture and also did it because he considered it an insult to the Asur that the dawi would seek peace and payment for crimes they didn't commit and a war they did not declare..Asur blood was ACTULLY
On The dawis hands at that point and I mean dwarfs died too but that was self defense..it was just the ambassador and his entourage were unlucky enough to show up after Snorri decided to Attack Kor Vaeneth.
5. No he was not murdered he was killed in combat and was bested by Gotrek Starbreaker because he was too arrogant and underestimated the dwarfs which is a fatal flaw and he payed the price with his head for his foolish arrogance
6.no they were not going to win the War plain and simple
7.its on the Dwarfs but Caeldor didn't have to shave those Dawi in his court he had every right to declare war on them or chooses to try an explain BUT Imaldrik already tried that and there would be no changing the other Thames mind so war was pretty much the only option Especially since the Dawi basically slaughtered an entire city. If the Phoenix king didn't go to war his advisers would quickly pull their support from the Phoenix king with so many lives lost
8.. Yeah they are my fave faction too but things are not just Black and white
Pretty much all there is to it.
They do not fling it around like other spell caster, but collect it in their runes and controle it via them. They do not dabble in magic like other races. Hell they are almost imune to it, threw the simple fact that they believe they are.
A dwarf wouldn't see the diffrence between dark or high magic.
I think OP made the thread to 'get the truth out there' (or at least his point of view of the truth). But I agree with you, the codices (I guess you are talking about the army books) are the highest authorities for questions concerning the lore ... authors of books can add to that, but not contradict (with/to?) it.
Spot on