If possible update dlc for tombkings comes would Prince Apophas be a candidate for the new lord slot?

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

I ask cause he is pretty dang unqiue amongst the tomb kings cause of the fact hes a living skull who's body is that of scarbs and I think could be a interesting both visually and ability wise

And also could we see the melee bone gaints of khemric titans?

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

Or maybe the bone gaint lich sehenesmet

[dirtypyrex]

+1

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

Originally posted by Dirty Pyrex:

+1

Alright:P

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

I'd love to hear what other people think

[Karsh]

then it should be a flc update cause ca doesn't wanna change their policy no dlc for dlc.

but it did happen before beastman got a lord flc as well back in the day so yeah it's possible if they want to give tomb kings more love

[Wh♂♂par]

I think going the Empire route as shown in 2 is a good way to stay out of DLC for DLC territory. You get 1 LL and some faction mechanics for TK, but everything else is blocked off.

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

Yeah makes sense ^-^ just would be cool to see some of the more unqiue tomb king lords ingame same with having actual melee bone gaints

[Kaaz]

i wants the glorious scarab boy since before tomb kings, im not sure its too likely though, unless as part of a couple of patches they add in a FLC for the game 2 race releases

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

Originally posted by Kaaz:

i wants the glorious scarab boy since before tomb kings, im not sure its too likely though, unless as part of a couple of patches they add in a FLC for the game 2 race releases

Sadly that's probably the only way we will see anything new for them

[halogamb]

Originally posted by Karsh:

then it should be a flc update cause ca doesn't wanna change their policy no dlc for dlc.

Misinformation.

https://www.reddit.com/r/totalwar/comments/d06c37/ca_confirms_no_dlc_for_dlc_rule_is_false_and_no/

[Jack Deth]

I mean...it's possible.

Isabella, Ghorst, Tretch and now Nakai are lords. So lore and fluff means squat in that regard.

I don't see why he couldn't be a lord...but...I would much prefer Ramhotep as a lord with Apophas functioning ala in Kroak manner with acquisition and implementation.

Snikch and Shadowblade as well..

For me, I'd obviously love to see him sooner than later...but the most opportune time would be if/when they release Nagash/End Time content.

[Leravi The Hyena:33]

Originally posted by Don Quixote:

I mean...it's possible.

Isabella, Ghorst, Tretch and now Nakai are lords. So lore and fluff means squat in that regard.

I don't see why he couldn't be a lord...but...I would much prefer Ramhotep as a lord with Apophas functioning ala in Kroak manner with acquisition and implementation.

Snikch and Shadowblade as well..

For me, I'd obviously love to see him sooner than later...but the most opportune time would be if/when they release Nagash/End Time content.

Mhm I get what your saying, what about the bone gaint lich senhesmet

[David McMurdo]

The undead generally need a complete reworking, because they're just awful. Their base troops are awful because they make up for it in the fact that they're immune to psychology and cause fear. In the tabletop game that works pretty well. In this, it doesn't work at all, because binding is psychology by another name except your troops just die instead of running away to rally fifty times. The Skaven, the most cowardly faction, should not be able to fight to the death against an equal sized undead horde. But they do. So new characters for the Vampire Counts or the Tomb Kings are of no interest to me until the undead generally aren't terrible. There are so many things, even the littlest things, that just work against them. like the fact that you can't cast spells on battlements, even though buffing their pathetic troops with spells is one of the few hopes that the undead have,

[Elitewrecker PT]

Being immune to psychology means your units won't start routing from terror or get leadership penalty from fear. If they weren't, they would start crumbling sooner when it by those debuffs.

[Karsh]

Originally posted by halogamb:

Originally posted by Karsh:

then it should be a flc update cause ca doesn't wanna change their policy no dlc for dlc.

Misinformation.

https://www.reddit.com/r/totalwar/comments/d06c37/ca_confirms_no_dlc_for_dlc_rule_is_false_and_no/

tbf that's quite recent didn't catch that one but before they did have said it somewhere but this means dlc for dlc can become a thing sadly