安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
As for the legend, i find his campaigns rather dull and predictable, as they offer very little in terms of entertainment. Watching him field armies of stegadons, or sisters of avelorn is simply not fun to watch. His disaster campaigns though, are quite fun as they have the element of randomness. So watching him deal with those is entertaining, even if it involves cheese.
This is because he kept stacking those Mages that boost the income for buildings in region and tax rate in the Lothern province. He literally could not fit any more in. So yes, cheese is absolutely what he does.
I do not like that.
Then again, he makes no excuses about being the cheese king so whether or not you like it depends on how entertaining you find him
Tell me, what's the point of playing easy and using inferior tactics? What's the point of playing normally even. Whatever your answer is, its the same answer for cheesing legendary unless the point of playing video games to you is to feel like you're not cheesing.
Seriously, the number of people who try to turn single player video games into a "right vs wrong" is staggering. Just word your post as "I don't like cheesing". That's all you mean anyways.
People shouldn't necessarily be judged, by the way they are trying to accomplish things. Facing impossible odds - corner camping...if it gives me the win I desire, outweirding the AI with cheap troops to reduce the AI's combat potential - aye
Most 'cheesy' tactics were proven to be quite effective in history and am quite sure, that nothing, that is actually described as 'cheese' wasn't at least used once in a real battle.
While reading this, one very weird example came to mind...so, let's assume one does clear all the shooter from the wall with one single big flyer .. Hiroshima comes to mind.
yeah my mind and I ain't always in yin-yang
(still prefer Zardar for his really common approach to things...but LoTW and his 'save my sh*t' vids are always a nice watch)
edit: btw...the AI is _NOT_ cheating, it get buffs/debuffs ..but it doesn't pull troops out of thin air, with no building available to actually recruit the unit (Shogun 2). That is a cheat....
I don't like the word 'cheat' in general, specially if used with 'AI'. Find yourself a decent programmer and ask him about how to get a proper AI working - he would maybe laugh at you, laugh at you even more and maybe give you an answer.
It's the same with the so-called RNG - there is NO such thing possible currently. Everything is predictable as it gets. (I think there is, but thats molecular science and am soo not good at it ^^)
All we do is feed a machine a 1 and a 0 .. and give it rules, how to decide between them.
...
Spamming sisters is not high risk. It beats everything. Spamming stegadons is not high risk, it beats everything. And every strategy relies on the failure of an opponent to react, because you're playing against an opponent that will always fail to react properly. What LegendOfTotalWar does is he uses optimal strategies. And using optimal strategies vs a weak opponent isn't fun to a lot of people. Like I think lightning strike is optimal, but its ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ boring to use cause the ai just can't beat you if you don't fight 20v40.
LegendOfTotalWar is more like some guy taking steroids so he can win pick up basketball games. He uses strategies that are overkill, not high risk high reward strategies.
Its just semantics, but I know people use the word cheese just to make it sound worse. But its honestly not possible to cheese an ai, it can't be high risk when you're fighting an opponent that will never react properly. Cheese tactics are pvp strategies, and there's a bigger reason why the word describes pvp. Because nobody actually gives a ♥♥♥♥ if you cheese an ai, and I don't fully understand why people pretend they do (my theory is it makes you sound more skilled if you say "I would never cheese").
Seriously though, you're not better at the game than LegendOfTotalWar because you refuse to use optimal strategies. Being better than him literally doesn't even matter because he's playing campaign. Playing optimally does not need justification. Just don't' do it if its not fun. Its even simpler than black and white, there's just nothing that requires justification even there.
LOL
Oh boy.
That's what I've gathered so far :) aye
[now no one cares about previous guy XYZ, who beats the game with stacks of 10+ dragons, cause that ain't cheese - or so others presumed]
edit: usually spelling
To be fair, if it were still about LegendOfTotalWar and not just the general concept of cheesing, the guy is a public figure. Its only technically single player when he's got hundreds of people watching him.
You know it would be nice from players to actually acknowledge that and keep asking devs why AI can still be cheesed the very ♥♥♥♥♥♥ same way as years ago.
Yeah i heard sending your general forwards to drain the ammunition from your enemies has been used throughout the ages in warfare. Don't even get me started about corner camping!
Wasting ammo is mostly viable when you attack, and you usually have to put your lord/hero on a very smaller mount to avoid damage (bigger hitbox), loosing an advantage of a dragon for example. CA would only need to add Ai scripts for priority targeting, but they don't care.