Vampire Lord vs Master Necromancer vs Strigoi Ghoul King

[jinjayx]

Since all Lords have a new level cap for 40.
Which lord is better?

I used to only use Master Necromancer
because I get to use more magic + Master Of The Dead to keep my Crypt Horrors alive.

But now that we have 40 levels, Vampire Lord and Strigoi Ghoul King seems to be a better choice.


Your thoughts?

[Vacca]

I prefer VLs simply to have a valid 1v1 lord duelist in my army.

[SleepyNarwhalz]

I always got Vampire Lords because they're good in melee and for all intents and purposes a regular necromancer worked well enough for me.

[Sargeist]

Vampire lords are better in combat, master necromancers are better at support. Ghoul kings are kinda sucky until they get their terrorgheist.

[jinjayx]

So may I put it this way:
Vampire Lord if the forces are supposed to be elites
Master Necromancer for tar pits.

Not sure what SGK is for.

[Toaster Maximus]

Ghoul King so handsome

[Coffeecool]

Originally posted by jinjayx:

So may I put it this way:
Vampire Lord if the forces are supposed to be elites
Master Necromancer for tar pits.

Not sure what SGK is for.

Yea i always use Necromancers for garrison and defense tasks

[Zane87]

Never used necromancers tbh.

Always choose the VL, they are great.
Tough enough to duel, able to kill regiments, both combined with the raise dead skill further augmenting this combat poweress and still be able to revive your army.

Never really saw any reason to use the Necro. His support abilities are not as strong as a lord that can kill 3-4 regiments on his own.

+ If an enemy wants to snipe your lord, you loose as VC. A VL hast better survival chances than the MN.