安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Yes, some of the stuff is too skimpy. However, with the layered armor system, I never had to wear the skimpy stuff if I didn't want to.
There are enough options, and enough flexibility in the system, that you never have to wear gear you don't want to. My girl is dressed up as an awesome biker-chick, but sometimes I like the full leather hunter's outfit, and other times I go for the heavy armor look depending on what I'm playing.
Most of the armors are the same straightforward 'practical' to the point of actually being impractical fare if one were to keep real world anatomy in mind (they would have to be adjusted for women to be able to move around in them with any amount of ease)that one would see any any modern Western RPG so one could really only come to this conclusion if one thinks that there should never be a more revealing option for female characters on any armor set, leaving that sort of thing to be the domain of male characters alone.
https://monsterhunterworld.wiki.fextralife.com/Armor
There should be more armor customization along with more options to adjust a character's features so everyone can tweak everything to their own tastes rather than trying the recipe for failure that is the one-size-fits-all approach to aesthetics.
If someone wants to be covered from head-to-toe in armor, that should be their choice just as it should be someone else's choice to have their character wear a scarf, a smile and nothing else as if they were Heracles wearing the Nemean Lion's pelt into combat alone.
Sure, there are exceptions - and I won't deny that I'm one of many who will happily stick with the normal buff-body chestpiece - but the vast majority leave everything to the imagination. You can't blame Capcom for eventually adding more appealing options throughout the games relatively long-ending lifespan, and I doubt that new games are going to begin with female hunters waltzing around in skimpy dresses with their knickers on display... though to be fair, I wouldn't be surprised either. Capcom do love their cosmetic DLC's.
Both sexes wearing the same restrictive gear with equal ease is more fantasy than everyone wearing revealing armor (since men have worn fairly skimpy armor in certain regions throughout history).
Do you actually have an example of this? Cause it is always the females that wear skimpy outfits after all. Is there actually some game or something somewhere with skimpy dressed men and non skimpy females where people where happy with the designs then?
Cause you'd have to have at least one in mind to make this argument, right?
Well it also sucks having loads of cosmetic options ruined because they needlessly added stupid thigh gaps to them.
They do, you just don't seem to want to acknowledge them.
Also yeah considering how many people would seem to like stereotypical barbarian style, it'd make sense to have skimpier options for males too.
Well it they're the kind of shorts that don't go into her ass crack then no I don't think no one will say that.
Ok..? That has literally nothing to do with this topic though.
See here's another person saying it, if they were equal people wouldn't complain about it.
Alpha-open visor
Beta-closed visor THANKS AND BACK OFF.