Can a GT 730 run this game?

[Voltaire]

I know I can run Resident Evil VII at about 30-40 frames on medium settings, but I also understand that MHW is most likely not going to be build on the same engine.

So I was wondering, could my lowly 730 be able to run this game at, in the least, the lowest settings?

[Moga CMDR]

Well they suggest a 760 as the lowest. So if it did run its very possible you won't hit 30fps. I don't think I have seen any test with anything lower than a 750ti, which did pretty well (but ofc a lot better than a 730)

I think the 750ti, when paired with a modern CPU did over 100fps at the lowest settings. Which CPU do you have?

[Kittysune]

Originally posted by Reverend Revenant:

I know I can run Resident Evil VII at about 30-40 frames on medium settings, but I also understand that MHW is most likely not going to be build on the same engine.

So I was wondering, could my lowly 730 be able to run this game at, in the least, the lowest settings?

it was still MT framework engine but it was heavly modified for MHW
well because you already bought the game best to find out is tried it yourself because some people won't take a risk

[Moga CMDR]

since you already have it, Kitty is right. I would suggest maybe not spending a lot of time in the character creator and just jump into the game. 2 hours will go by fast, and you'll want to get into doing some of the quests to test the machine best.

Lots of cutscene in the first 2 hours and you can't skip them.

[Voltaire]

Ouch, okay then, I'll just hope for the best I suppose, thank you for the responses.

[Mako Ruu]

I doubt it very strongly.

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GeForce-GT-730/2187vsm12582

If we look at this benchmark against the 750 ti, the GT 730 is almost 300% weaker. And the 750 ti runs Monster Hunter World at it's lowest settings around 40 - 50 fps.

So your 730 may not even be able to manage 30 fps at lowest settings. You'll have to play at a very low resolution of maybe 720p.

[nicowocin]

are the requirements and the engine the same? if you can run it but it has bad framerates, i'd expect "lowspecgamer" to put out some videos on how to tweak it to go below lowest settings but idk when thats gonna happen or if its possible for mhw. gl!

[Moga CMDR]

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

I And the 750 ti runs Monster Hunter World at it's lowest settings around 40 - 50 fps.

It was able to do over 100fps @1080p with the more modern i3 actually. But we don't know the OP cpu.

[Mako Ruu]

Originally posted by Guild Sweetheart:

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

I And the 750 ti runs Monster Hunter World at it's lowest settings around 40 - 50 fps.

It was able to do over 100fps @1080p with the more modern i3 actually. But we don't know the OP cpu.

0.1% spikes don't represent average frame rates, though. The game becomes much more demanding in larger battles with more intense monsters in dense forested areas.


Of course, standing in a low density area staring out at the sky box would see a raise in frame time performance. But in the video, Back2Gaming only ran around in the front starting area and attacked smaller monsters. I imagine it would see a performance tank against a larger monster with flashier abilities.

[iNol]

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

I doubt it very strongly.

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GeForce-GT-730/2187vsm12582

If we look at this benchmark against the 750 ti, the GT 730 is almost 300% weaker. And the 750 ti runs Monster Hunter World at it's lowest settings around 40 - 50 fps.

So your 730 may not even be able to manage 30 fps at lowest settings. You'll have to play at a very low resolution of maybe 720p.

The game benchmark on your link says 750Ti is +107% stronger in the games, albeit based on only 2 games.

750Ti can run the game at lowest settings at 1080p at 45-65 fps, mostly around 55 fps (I saw the vid yesterday), so I'd say 730 have a chance to reach 30 fps. in lower resolutions, it should get higher fps.

[iNol]

Originally posted by Guild Sweetheart:

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

I And the 750 ti runs Monster Hunter World at it's lowest settings around 40 - 50 fps.

It was able to do over 100fps @1080p with the more modern i3 actually. But we don't know the OP cpu.

interesting. any chance you have the video? what i3 you are using?

[Mako Ruu]

Originally posted by iNol iGunggung:

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

I doubt it very strongly.

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-750-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GeForce-GT-730/2187vsm12582

If we look at this benchmark against the 750 ti, the GT 730 is almost 300% weaker. And the 750 ti runs Monster Hunter World at it's lowest settings around 40 - 50 fps.

So your 730 may not even be able to manage 30 fps at lowest settings. You'll have to play at a very low resolution of maybe 720p.

The game benchmark on your link says 750Ti is +107% stronger in the games, albeit based on only 2 games.

750Ti can run the game at lowest settings at 1080p at 45-65 fps, mostly around 55 fps (I saw the vid yesterday), so I'd say 730 have a chance to reach 30 fps. in lower resolutions, it should get higher fps.

CS:GO and League of Legends are hardly worthy benchmarks.

The effective speed is what you should be looking at. A demanding PC Port like Monster Hunter World is going to be pretty difficult to handle at launch. Maybe with patching there could be better performance on older hardware. As it is, I'm kind of worried for my 960, seeing as the 1050 ti can barely manage 30 fps on maxed out settings, and they're both similar in performance.

It's good that you're hopeful, but the GT 730 is a weaker GPU with DDR3 and a 64 bit memory bus.(Though there is a DDR5 variant that's more rare.)

Wouldn't it be sad if he bought the game and couldn't play?

[Moga CMDR]

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

Wouldn't it be sad if he bought the game and couldn't play?

He bought the game before you got here.

[Mako Ruu]

Originally posted by Guild Sweetheart:

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

Wouldn't it be sad if he bought the game and couldn't play?

He bought the game before you got here.

Irrelevant to my point, but okay.

[iNol]

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

CS:GO and League of Legends are hardly worthy benchmarks.

The effective speed is what you should be looking at. A demanding PC Port like Monster Hunter World is going to be pretty difficult to handle at launch. Maybe with patching there could be better performance on older hardware. As it is, I'm kind of worried for my 960, seeing as the 1050 ti can barely manage 30 fps on maxed out settings, and they're both similar in performance.

It's good that you're hopeful, but the GT 730 is a weaker GPU with DDR3 and a 64 bit memory bus.(Though there is a DDR5 variant that's more rare.)

Wouldn't it be sad if he bought the game and couldn't play?

Effective speed comparison is not direct comparison of game fps so if you say something is 300% stronger might give him the wrong idea that the fps difference would be roughly 300%, but it's not that bad in reality of game fps. The 2 games provide real example of how the fps compare in real games application and we have the average. More games would be better for the comparison but I still like it even only 2 coz they are real games and not just benchmark software. They give better idea of how the gpus actually perform in games, closer than effective speed comparison.

He can refund the game if the performance is too bad for his expectations.

I think the game will perform fine, in a sense that it can run smoothly somehow. Some stuff on the settings might be buggy, or badly worth the performance hit (vs visual improvement). We just change the settings and it should be good to go.

[Mako Ruu]

Originally posted by iNol iGunggung:

Originally posted by Mako Ruu:

CS:GO and League of Legends are hardly worthy benchmarks.

The effective speed is what you should be looking at. A demanding PC Port like Monster Hunter World is going to be pretty difficult to handle at launch. Maybe with patching there could be better performance on older hardware. As it is, I'm kind of worried for my 960, seeing as the 1050 ti can barely manage 30 fps on maxed out settings, and they're both similar in performance.

It's good that you're hopeful, but the GT 730 is a weaker GPU with DDR3 and a 64 bit memory bus.(Though there is a DDR5 variant that's more rare.)

Wouldn't it be sad if he bought the game and couldn't play?

Effective speed comparison is not direct comparison of game fps so if you say something is 300% stronger might give him the wrong idea that the fps difference would be roughly 300%, but it's not that bad in reality of game fps. The 2 games provide real example of how the fps compare in real games application and we have the average. More games would be better for the comparison but I still like it even only 2 coz they are real games and not just benchmark software. They give better idea of how the gpus actually perform in games, closer than effective speed comparison.

He can refund the game if the performance is too bad for his expectations.

I think the game will perform fine, in a sense that it can run smoothly somehow. Some stuff on the settings might be buggy, or badly worth the performance hit (vs visual improvement). We just change the settings and it should be good to go.

It's good to have hope, at least.

We don't know the rest of his PC. He could have an extremely out dated dual core CPU and only 4GBs of RAM. The GPU is not the only factor here. Even the i5 2600k had stuttering issues with MHW.

Yes, the game may be playable at 720p lowest settings and be able to maintain 20 - 30 fps if the rest of his PC was able to handle the game well enough for the GPU to do it's job.