Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Use the Anja Arch against Lavasioth. It will keep his armor molten. Either water or ice will speed up how quickly the armor hardens, so they are actually bad choices in spite of his weaknesses.
But yes, on Lavasioth, you're relying on the Anja Arch's raw to actually deal damage, and the fire to keep his armor weakened.
Yeah Lavasioth is kind of an exception when it comes to water weakness due to his lava hardening mechanic. But on Kulu-Ya-Ku, Anja, Kadachi, Teostra, Great Kirros and Uragaan, you want water element.
So quite a few monsters that are best beaten with the Hunter's Proudbow II (or Tartoth Arrow "Water") instead of Snowfletcher.
i feel like people - like you - are constantly overestimating the elemental hitzones on most monsters
there are very, very few instances in the entire series as a whole where priotizing element over raw is a good idea, and that's because their raw hitzones are inaccessible most of the time, or are simply trash, while their elemental hitzones are better than their raw hitzones
that basically amounts to chameleos and gravios/basarios
while hazaak may only have 190 true raw to dragonbone's 180, the difference of 15 more dragon element is negligible, and in few cases is actually going to outdamage that 10 raw
this is also the reason why historically nobody looking for pure efficiency would pick a kirin weapon over any other alternatives, because kirin weapons have such hilariously low true raw
same goes for divine exodus / eternal strife / ashen lao shan weapons
inb4 'but bow/SNS/DS are fast-hitting low raw weapons!'
to disregard raw entirely because the weapons have low MV's implies a certain lack of knowledge on how MV's work
the same still applies for those weapons; for efficiency's sake, having a higher base raw and middle-of-the-road element is better than having high element but pitifully low raw
the only real argument that can be made for excessively high element is in edge cases like gravios, which has something insane like a 65/80 hitzone on its broken stomach
and surprise surprise, he isn't in this game
All speedrunners in MHW use those elemental bows even if they have average or bad raw simply because they do more damage. Otherwise they would all run Cera - and anyone who ever played with that bow knows how bad its damage if played in the standard way.
If what you said was right, people would play Daora over Legia or Xeno over Vaal/Dragonbone, and Rath would be as efficient as Anja. But this doesn't happen, because the elemental crits boost the damage considerably.
In short, if you don't run Critical Element, then whatever goes. But if you run it (which is what has given the highest damage output on bows so far), then high elemental damage is the most important thing in almost every situation.
At the point you are in the game you should be able to craft armor for those slots so it's not that important. Also the bow can only be augmented once while the alternatives can be augmented 2 or 3 times, which will help make up for the lower affinity.
Jesus Christ, so much friggen math. Why can’t I just take my giant club and crack some skulls without having to worry about whether it’s a “bone” type or “dragon” type?
As Gat from Saint’s Row said “bullets still kill a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.”
Nothing is stopping you. There are plenty of weapons types which essentially have one best weapon for maximum damage output.