Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So yes. It would be heroic to the people who matter. The ones who chose to take the responsibility for their own lives, instead of withering because of blind corporate obedience.
Like I said: Reed's an idiot. But. He approaches you in good faith and wants to make amends with the deserters - moreover he reacts with complete shock when you suggest just killing them all. Adelaide does her absolute best to manipulate you into helping her and abjectly refuses to make amends with Reed, and when you mention "taking care of Reed", she's completely ambivalent.
Most importantly, Reed voluntarily steps down *and expects to die* when you explain to him Adelaide can save his town from the plague. Meanwhile, she would wallow in her failure and hatred letting everyone in Edgewater - including her own "family" who for lack of other option go back - die to the plague rather than try to get along with Reed.
She's a monster, and certainly no leader.