Drive by auto aim cheater?

[Wazzup]

T 1 level 72 player called "dsfegfv" sometimes the cheating is a little to obvious to tolerate

https://youtu.be/TiDQGK4wuhA

so he just got a temp ban, within minutes of reporting

[Lega]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Wazzup:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

I didn't start the talk so it seems, it isn't my penny.

I started it, but with a question mark. So was he cheating or just a misunderstood player? He displayed all the attributes of unfair play, the tooting to attract attention, the hits when shooting wide, the random name, the low level but great game play. Sometimes if it walks like a duck and looks like a duck .....it is a duck.

Did you read my post?

I didn't say he's not cheating and no, you didn't start it the sub discussion with me, I meant someone else.

[lilPunisher1337]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Shady Knights:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

"the recoil only kicks in after the player is dead Lega??"

What?

It's a pretty simple concept to understand, the cheat software is being fed details as to player location etc, the aimbot locks onto that and moves the sight onto the target.

When the player being targeted is dead, there's no more info about that player.

The sight no longer locks onto the target. The recoil effect instantly becomes obvious as soon as the player died.

It's a sign of some types of aimbot. Some don't work like this, some will stop shooting automatically once the target is dead for instance, so you don't get this effect. This video demonstrates it perfectly when recoil kicks in after the player is dead. This is because the cheat isn't controlling the recoil, the aimbot is while it has an active target.

It's a signature of aimbot being used.

As I said, it's WackyJacky on his many videos educating the playerbase about this. You obviously don't know about this and don't know what you are talking about.

Bro, you spending too many of your precious time on arguing with Lega person, cuz that person just devil's advocate, i don't know and don't care if he paid by devs or not, but it's just dead end to discusess with him.When some times i doing some content for tik tok and showing cheaters there be 2 or 3 guys who arguing with me and telling me they not cheaters, it just i have skill issue and 1 or 2 of them told me they saw only 3 or 2 cheaters for 5k hours gameplay and hard to say they was trolling or they same as Legaboy

[Lega]

I wrote already, I did not say he wasn't cheating but one post later the same wrong claim appears again.

You are right if you say it makes no sense to speak with specific people but it isn't me.

Thanks for proving the point and I don't need to start all that personal crap about others but there is no discussion where not at least one guy starts rubbish like that.

If you don't have arguments or can't deal with other opinions, why do you write in social medias?

[lilPunisher1337]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

I wrote already, I did not say he wasn't cheating but one post later the same wrong claim appears again.

You are right if you say it makes no sense to speak with specific people but it isn't me.

Thanks for proving the point and I don't need to start all that personal crap but there is no discussion where not at least one guy starts such rubbish.

If you don't have arguments or can't deal with other opinions, why do you write in social medias?

You came to wrong conclusion, i like to deal with other opinions,especially with ppl who trying to tell me black is white, it's like speaking with children, it's fun. And i think most of them real teenagers maybe not physically but mentally . And honestly i have been on their place, when i was teenager too, mb cuz of that i like it

[Lega]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von lilPunisher1337:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

I wrote already, I did not say he wasn't cheating but one post later the same wrong claim appears again.

You are right if you say it makes no sense to speak with specific people but it isn't me.

Thanks for proving the point and I don't need to start all that personal crap but there is no discussion where not at least one guy starts such rubbish.

If you don't have arguments or can't deal with other opinions, why do you write in social medias?

You came to wrong conclusion, i like to deal with other opinions,especially with ppl who trying to tell me black is white, it's like speaking with children, it's fun. And i think most of them real teenagers maybe not physically but mentally . And honestly i have been on their place, when i was teenager too, mb cuz of that i like it

I said Shady is wrong and why but nothing else.

Please look what you wrote so yes, I can deal if people disagree without to say how much I dislike them or what they write.

You disagree to what I said about the case of the OP?

No problem, so we move on, have a good one!

Nothing else matters.

[Ragman006]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

"the recoil only kicks in after the player is dead Lega??"

What?

Anti-cheat devs wouldn't even use this footage to judge him because it's compromised and useless. If you don't know this you either don't have a clue or don't care but that's one reason why anti-cheat devs don't use video evidence that often.

In particular, for aim bots, no-recoil and your point about "kicks", makes no sense if you see how aim bots work. They don't impact the recoil, it has to be controlled by the player or no recoil but if he used no recoil, why was there something that kicks in?

Maybe, only maybe, if he used a full aimbot, it would does what you say but than he would be dead after the first bullets but he missed most of the shots.

Sorry but, it makes no sense whatsoever because of too many open questions.

It doesn't even matter because I don't say he's not cheating. lol

Check my videos about PUBG aim bot and you can find evidence to call, the cheater used aim bot. Maybe you see the difference to this case and why I said what I say. Cases about Apex are even better for this because Aim bots are much more common and way more obvious.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Shady Knights:

Hmmm...like Tektite's hackusation that you got completely wrong? How about all the examples I've linked and asked you to comment if they are cheating or not which you fail to answer? Or the other example that you said you only checked superficially? Doesn't really sound like you do check cases all the time properly at all.

More like you frequently get it wrong (like this one).

I reduced my time in this board about 90% and this talk is the best example and it was the reason why I checked the last case superficially because I thought, if I agree to the point people have a reason to complain about that case, it would be fine but no, even if I agree, it's wrong.

What you don't see is, I didn't call the guy a cheater because I didn't watch the full video but a quick look was enough to see him as suspect. To call him a cheater I need to check all. As you can see, I do things right..

I don't know the case of Tekite anymore, can't say anything about it.

How the hell would you know what the information the anti cheat devs use?
They tell us when you submit a ticket that they dont divulge any info as to the process and protocols they use yet somehow you are an expert in what they can and cant do along with what they will and wont use.
You really should do some more research into what aimbot hacks actually do.

[Lega]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

How the hell would you know what the information the anti cheat devs use?
They tell us when you submit a ticket that they dont divulge any info as to the process and protocols they use yet somehow you are an expert in what they can and cant do along with what they will and wont use.
You really should do some more research into what aimbot hacks actually do.

Unlike many others, I do research and if you have a source that explains how a straight aim bot missed 95% of all shots, please post it to me.

How do I know stuff about what anti-cheats use?

Because I reasearch and I posted plenty of different sources that explain almost everything.
I also was part of the overwatch program of PUBG, created by SteveTheHappyWhale where we discussed a lot of cases where we had the same standard as all anti-cheats in terms of judging cases based on video evidence.

The aim of the video is so far off, impossible to use and just because there is one indicator for aim-bot, doesn't mean it's useful in terms of punishement.

As I said already, check my videos about aim bot and PUBG and you can see straight aim bots live in action. Maybe you see the difference.

[Ragman006]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

How the hell would you know what the information the anti cheat devs use?
They tell us when you submit a ticket that they dont divulge any info as to the process and protocols they use yet somehow you are an expert in what they can and cant do along with what they will and wont use.
You really should do some more research into what aimbot hacks actually do.

Unlike many others, I do research and if you have a source that explains how a straight aim bot missed 95% of all shots, please post it to me.

How do I know stuff about what anti-cheats use?

Because I reasearch and I posted plenty of different sources that explain almost everything.
I also was part of the overwatch program of PUBG, created by SteveTheHappyWhale where we discussed a lot of cases.

The aim of the video is so far off, impossible to use and just because there is one indicator for aim-bot, doesn't mean it's useful in terms of punishement.

As I said already, check my videos about aim bot and PUBG and you can see straight aim bots live in action. Maybe you see the difference.

Please post your research where it shows aimbot doesnt control the recoil. Aimbot does miss a lot of shots. Imagine how easy it would be to track it if it didnt. pretty simple stuff that you dont need an "expert"to tell you.
Can you please elaborate as to the function of the "Overwatch" program as Ive never heard of it?

[Lega]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

Please post your research where it shows aimbot doesnt control the recoil. Aimbot does miss a lot of shots. Imagine how easy it would be to track it if it didnt. pretty simple stuff that you dont need an "expert"to tell you.
Can you please elaborate as to the function of the "Overwatch" program as Ive never heard of it?

You didn't read, "Maybe it does"?

I see this point but only if you have an aimbot that looks onto the target completly but then, it doesn't miss shots.

If it unlocks in between, we would see much more, "kicks".

I don't know every detail about aim bots but this fact alone is one reason why I judge carefully compared to others and if the aim bot missed so many shots, it's not obvious and this one kick isn't enough to call it this way.

If this is obvious, what aim bots did my cheaters of my videos use?

Maybe it makes more sense this way, so please check one of my videos, maybe some of Apex too because PUBG is harmless compared to that. lol

[Ragman006]

Champ, Im not interested in your video's. Its clear you dont understand aimbot very well.
What I am interested in is what was the function of the Overwatch program that you're claiming credit for being a part of??

[Lega]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

Champ, Im not interested in your video's. Its clear you dont understand aimbot very well.
What I am interested in is what was the function of the Overwatch program that you're claiming credit for being a part of??

Repeating, "You don't understand aim bots well", is no argument but I leave this here because you can't talk.

For everything else:

PUBG Shield.

[Ragman006]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

Champ, Im not interested in your video's. Its clear you dont understand aimbot very well.
What I am interested in is what was the function of the Overwatch program that you're claiming credit for being a part of??

Repeating, "You don't understand aim bots well", is no argument but I leave this here because you can't talk.

For everything else:

PUBG Shield.

Ahh PUBG shield that used to use video's as evidence of cheating. So PUBG did share anticheat info with randoms on discord??
P.S "You cant talk" is Lega code for "You dont fall for my crap"

[Ragman006]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

Please post your research where it shows aimbot doesnt control the recoil. Aimbot does miss a lot of shots. Imagine how easy it would be to track it if it didnt. pretty simple stuff that you dont need an "expert"to tell you.
Can you please elaborate as to the function of the "Overwatch" program as Ive never heard of it?

You didn't read, "Maybe it does"?

Blatant lie!!
Here's your comment about aimbots and no recoil. "In particular, for aim bots, no-recoil and your point about "kicks", makes no sense if you see how aim bots work. They don't impact the recoil, it has to be controlled by the player or no recoil but if he used no recoil, why was there something that kicks in?"
You very clearly state that aimbots dont effect the recoil and the player has to still control it. There was no "maybe" in your statement.
It appears I did read it.

[Shady Knights]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lega:

As I said, you can suspect aim bot but if you say it's 100% aim bot for sure, well no and I don't think Wacky would have issues with my pov. Your point about the recoil may indicate aim bot but that's it.

It is aimbot. You are coping.

Wacky would ban you from the live Twitch stream if you were arguing like this if it was him that broke down why this guy has aimbot, especially with the signature recoil kick in after death. Seen it many times where cheat deniers casting doubt on his claims get banned.

Cope harder.

[Shady Knights]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Ragman006:

Blatant lie!!
Here's your comment about aimbots and no recoil. "In particular, for aim bots, no-recoil and your point about "kicks", makes no sense if you see how aim bots work. They don't impact the recoil, it has to be controlled by the player or no recoil but if he used no recoil, why was there something that kicks in?"
You very clearly state that aimbots dont effect the recoil and the player has to still control it. There was no "maybe" in your statement.
It appears I did read it.

Exactly. Doesn't even understand how it works yet is arguing incessantly about it.